Carotid sinus syndrome in carotid angioplasty with stenting

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. Significant progress has been made in primary stroke prevention, including through the widespread use of carotid angioplasty with stenting (CAS). At the same time, there is a growing number of publications reporting the development of carotid sinus syndrome (CSS) (haemodynamic instability) in the periope- rative period, as well as cerebral and cardiac complications and death, which requires in-depth study to improve the quality of medical care for patients with carotid artery stenosis.

The aim of the study was to determine the frequency, risk factors, clinical features and outcomes of CSS in patients with carotid artery stenosis undergoing CAS.

Materials and methods. The study included 120 patients with carotid artery disease, who underwent an elective surgical intervention consisting of transluminal balloon angioplasty. All patients underwent comprehensive clinical and laboratory tests and imaging studies.

Results. CSS developed in 70% of cases (n = 84) of carotid artery stenosis, and was significantly more common in men than women (71.4% vs. 28.6%, respectively) (p < 0.05). The median age of all patients with CSS was 68 (44–91) years. Mixed form of CSS was significantly more common than the cardioinhibitory or vasodepressor forms (p < 0.05). In more than half of all cases, symptoms developed during balloon dilatation or within an hour afterwards. The duration of CSS was 30–40 hours. Contralateral carotid occlusion was detected in 12 (10%) patients, significantly (p < 0.05) more often in patients with CSS (13%) compared to patients without CSS (2.8%).

Conclusion. Regardless of stenosis severity or symptoms, CAS is accompanied by CSS in 2/3 of cases. The CSS is predominantly a mixed type and can be accompanied by loss of consciousness in rare cases. CSS appears both intraoperatively and in the early postoperative period, and its average duration is 1.5 days. A factor that may be associated with CSS development is contralateral carotid artery occlusion (p > 0.05).

About the authors

Roman V. Polishchuk

Research Center of Neurology

Author for correspondence.
Email: romapol@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2850-3999

anesthesiologist-reanimatologist, neurologist, Intensive critical care department

Russian Federation, 125367 Moscow, Volokolamskoye shosse, 80

Мikhail A. Piradov

Research Center of Neurology

Email: romapol@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6338-0392

D. Sci. (Med), Prof., Full Member of RAS, Director, Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia; Head, Division of diseases of the nervous system

Russian Federation, 125367 Moscow, Volokolamskoye shosse, 80

Yulia V. Ryabinkina

Research Center of Neurology

Email: romapol@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8576-9983

D. Sci. (Med.), Head, Intensive critical care department

Russian Federation, 125367 Moscow, Volokolamskoye shosse, 80

Vladimir L. Shchipakin

Research Center of Neurology

Email: romapol@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1428-2769

Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head, Group of vascular and endovascular surgery, senior researcher

Russian Federation, 125367 Moscow, Volokolamskoye shosse, 80

Aleksandr Yu. Koshcheev

Research Center of Neurology

Email: romapol@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0160-7499

Cand. Sci. (Med.), cardiovascular surgeon, Group of vascular and endovascular surgery

Russian Federation, 125367 Moscow, Volokolamskoye shosse, 80

Polina R. Prokazova

Research Center of Neurology

Email: romapol@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5837-6391

Cand. Sci. (Med.), neurologist, Intensive critical care department

Russian Federation, 125367 Moscow, Volokolamskoye shosse, 80

References

  1. Piradov M.A., Tanashyan M.M., Maksimova M.Yu. (eds.) [Stroke: modern diagnostic and treatment technologies]. Moscow, 2018. 360 p. DOI: 10.24421/ MP.2018.18.15909. (In Russ.)
  2. Bokeriya L.A., Pokrovskiy A.V., Sokurenko G.Yu. et al. National guidelines for the management of patients with diseases of the brachiocephalic arteries. Moscow, 2013, 72 p. (In Russ.)
  3. Czermak J. Ueber mechanische Vagus Reizung beim Menschen. Jenaische Ztschr. f. Med. u. Naturwiss. 1866;2:384–455.
  4. Weiss S., Baker JP. The carotid sinus reflex in health and disease. Its role in the causation of fainting and convulsions. Medicine. 1933;12:297–345.
  5. Mendelsohn F.O., Weissman N.J., Lederman R.J. et al. Acute hemodynamic changes during carotid artery stenting. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82(9):1077–1081. doi: 10.1016/s0002­9149(98)00562­1. PMID: 9817485.
  6. Strasberg B., Sagie A., Erdman S. et al. Carotid sinus hypersensitivity and the carotid sinus syndrome. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1989;31(5):379–391. doi: 10.1016/0033­0620(89)90032­7. PMID: 2646658.
  7. Cao Q., Zhang J., Xu G. Hemodynamic changes and baroreflex sensitivity associated with carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting. Interv Neurol. 2014;3(1):13–21. doi: 10.1159/000366231. PMID: 25999987.
  8. Leisch F., Kerschner K., Hofmann R. et al. Carotid sinus reactions during carotid artery stenting: predictors, incidence, and influence on clinical outcome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2003;58(4):516–523. doi: 10.1002/ccd.10483. PMID: 12652504.
  9. Altinbas A., Algra A., Bonati L.H. Periprocedural hemodynamic depression is associated with a higher number of new ischemic brain lesions after stenting in the international carotid stenting study — MRI Substudy. Stroke. 2014;45(1):146–151. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003397. PMID: 24203845.
  10. Pappada G., Beghi E., Marina R. et al. Hemodynamic instability after extracranial carotid stenting. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;148(6):639–645. doi: 10.1007/s00701­006­0752­2. PMID: 16523226.
  11. Lim S. Javorski MJ., Nassoiy SP. et al. Long­term hemodynamic effects after carotid artery revascularization. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2019;53(4):297–302. doi: 10.1177/1538574419828088. PMID: 30744510.
  12. Altinbas A., Algra A., Brown MM. et al. Effects of carotid endarterectomy or stenting on hemodynamic complications in the International Carotid Stenting Study: a randomized comparison. Int J Stroke. 2014;9(3):284–290. doi: 10.1111/ijs.12089. PMID: 23834300.
  13. Mylonas S.N., Moulakakis K.G., Antonopoulos C.N. Carotid artery stenting — induced hemodynamic instability. J Endovasc Ther. 2013;20(1):48–60. doi: 10.1583/12­4015.1. PMID: 23391083.
  14. Mourikis D., Chatoupis K., Katsenis K. et al. Percutaneous injection of lidocaine within the carotid body area in carotid artery stenting: an ‘‘old­new’’ technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;31(4):709–712. doi: 10.1007/s00270­007­9239­7. PMID: 18060454.
  15. Yan Z., Yang M., Niu G. et al. Analysis of hemodynamic changes in early stage after carotid stenting by transcranial Doppler — a preliminary study. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;45:85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.06.124. PMID: 28687500.
  16. Nanto M., Goto Y., Yamamoto H. et al. Complications and predictors of hypotension requiring vasopressor after carotid artery stenting. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017;57(3):115–121. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2016­0155. PMID: 28154342.
  17. Bussière M., Lownie SP., Lee D. et al. Hemodynamic instability during carotid artery stenting: the relative contribution of stent deployment versus balloon dilation? J Neurosurg. 2009;110(5):905–912. doi: 10.3171/2008.9.JNS08509. PMID: 19231933.
  18. Tsurumi A., Miyachi S., Hososhima O. et al. Can periprocedural hypotension in carotid artery stenting be predicted? A carotid morphologic autonomic pathologic scoring model using virtual histology to anticipate hypotension. Interv Neuroradiol. 2009;15(1):17–28. doi: 10.1177/159101990901500104. PMID: 20465945.
  19. Rubio G., Karwowski J.K., DeAmorim H. et al. Predicting factors associated with postoperative hypotension following carotid artery stenting. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;54:193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.06.005(18). PMID: 30092434.
  20. Gray­Weale A.C., Graham J.C., Burnett J.R. et al. Carotid artery atheroma: comparison of preoperative B­mode ultrasound appearance with carotid endarterectomy specimen pathology. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 1988;29(6):676–681. PMID: 3062007.
  21. Chechetkin A.O. [Comprehensive assessment of atherosclerotic lesions of the branches of the aortic arch at the stages of endovascular interventions: Theses D. Sci. (Med.)] Moscow, 2012. 306 p. (In Russ.)
  22. Noori V.J., Aranson N.J., Malas M. et al. Risk factors and impact of postoperative hypotension after carotid artery stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73(3):975–982. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.06.116. PMID: 32707379.
  23. Lin P.H., Zhou W., Kougias P. et al. Factors associated with hypotension and bradycardia after carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2007;46(5):846–853. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.07.020. PMID: 17980268.
  24. Struk Yu.V., Yakusheva O.A., Sarychev P.V., Mishcherin V.A. [Evaluation of hemodynamic findings during the operations of internal carotid artery stenting]. International Scientific Institute «Educatio». 2015;3(10):60–62. (In Russ.)
  25. Wieling W., Krediet CT., Solari D. et al. At the heart of the arterial baroreflex: a physiological basis for a new classification of carotid sinus hypersensitivity. J Intern Med. 2013;273(4):345–358. doi: 10.1111/joim.12042.22. PMID: 23510365.
  26. Krediet C.T., Parry S.W., Jardine D.L. et al. The history of diagnosing carotid sinus hypersensitivity: why are the current criteria too sensitive? Europace. 2011;13(1):14–22. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq409. PMID: 21088002.
  27. Da Silva R.M. Syncope: epidemiology, etiology, and prognosis. Front Physiol. 2014;5:471. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00471. PMID: 25538626.
  28. Kojuri J., Ostovan MA., Zamiri N. et al. Hemodynamic instability following carotid artery stenting. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;30(6):E12. doi: 10.3171/2010.12.FOCUS10219. PMID: 21631213.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2021 Polishchuk R.V., Piradov М.A., Ryabinkina Y.V., Shchipakin V.L., Koshcheev A.Y., Prokazova P.R.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-83204 от 12.05.2022.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies