<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2075-5473</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2409-2533</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">296</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/psaic296</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Reviews</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Обзоры</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">The use of structural and functional neuroimaging for the evaluation of motor rehabilitation in patients with ischemic stroke</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Возможности функциональной и структурной нейровизуализации в изучении восстановления двигательных функций после ишемического инсульта</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9929-2725</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Dobrynina</surname><given-names>Larisa A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Добрынина</surname><given-names>Лариса Анатольевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>D. Sci. (Med.), Head, 3<sup>rd</sup> Neurology department</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>д.м.н., г.н.с., рук. 3-го неврологического отделения</p></bio><email>dobrla@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Research Center of Neurology</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБНУ «Научный центр неврологии»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2011-09-13" publication-format="electronic"><day>13</day><month>09</month><year>2011</year></pub-date><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>53</fpage><lpage>61</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2017-02-03"><day>03</day><month>02</month><year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2011, Dobrynina L.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2011, Dobrynina L.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2011</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Dobrynina L.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Dobrynina L.A.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://annaly-nevrologii.com/pathID/article/view/296">https://annaly-nevrologii.com/pathID/article/view/296</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p> </p><p>We briefly review the methods of structural and functional neuroimaging use for the evaluation of motor rehabilitation after ischemic stroke. The results of studies for functional adaptive changes in stroke patients with different severity of corticospinal tract damage, various approaches to evaluation of rehabilitation prognosis and development of rehabilitation strategies designed to reduce impairment are discussed.</p>  <p> </p> <p> </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>В настоящем обзоре представлены краткие сведения о возможностях основных структурных и функциональных нейровизуализационных методов в изучении восстановления двигательных функций после ишемического инсульта; обобщены результаты исследований, посвященные функциональным адаптивным изменениям у больных с мозговыми инфарктами и разной степенью вовлечения кортикоспинального тракта; освещены подходы к оценке прогноза восстановления и разработке реабилитационных стратегий, направленных на уменьшение степени неврологического дефекта.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>fMRI</kwd><kwd>transcranial magnetic stimulation</kwd><kwd>plasticity</kwd><kwd>ischemic stroke</kwd><kwd>rehabilitation</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>функциональная МРТ</kwd><kwd>транскраниальная магнитная стимуляция</kwd><kwd>пластичность</kwd><kwd>ишемический инсульт</kwd><kwd>восстановление</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Andres F.G., Mima T., Schulman A.E. et al. Functional coupling of human cortical sensorimotor areas during bimanual skill acquisition. Brain 1999; 122: 855–870.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Arthurs O., Boniface S. How well do we understand the neural origins of the fMRI BOLD signal? Trends Neurosci. 2002; 25: 27–31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Barker A.T., Jalinos R., Freeston I.L. Non invasive stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985; 1: 1106–1107.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Baron J.C., Cohen L.G., Cramer S.C. et al. Neuroimaging in stroke recovery: a position paper from the First International Workshop on Neuroimaging and Stroke Recovery. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2004; 18: 260–267.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Basser P.J., Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J. Magn. Reson. B. 1996; 111: 209–219.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Binkofski F., Seitz R.J., Arnold S. et al. Thalamic metabolism and cortocospinal tract integrity determine motor recovery in stroke. Ann. Neurol. 1996; 39: 460–470.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Bonaiuti D., Grimaldi M. Neuroimaging: a new challenge in neurorehabilitation of stroke patients. Eura. Medicophys. 2007; 43 (2): 215–219.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Brown J.A., Lutsep H., Cramer S.C., Weinand M.Motor cortex stimulation for enhancement of recovery after stroke: case report. Neurol. Res. 2003; 25: 815–818.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Butefisch C.M., Kleiser R., Korber B. et al. Recruitment of contralesional motor cortex in stroke patients with recovery of hand function. Neurology 2005; 64: 1067–1069.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Butefisch C.M., Kleiser R., Seitz R.J. Post-lesional cerebral reorganization: evidence from functional neuroimaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. Physiol Paris 2006; 99: 437–454.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Butefisch C.M., Netz J., Wessling M., Homberg V. Remote changes in cortical excitability after stroke. Brain 2003; 126: 470–481.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Calautti C., Baron J.C. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke 2003; 34: 1553–1566.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Calautti C., Leroy F., Guincestre J.Y., Baron J.C. Displacement of primary sensorimotor cortex activation after subcortical stroke: a longitudinal PET study with clinical correlation. Neuroimage 2003 (b); 19: 1650–1654.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Calautti C., Leroy F., Guincestre J.Y., Baron J.C. Dynamics of motor network overactivation after striatocapsular stroke: a longitudinal PET study using a fixed-performance paradigm. Stroke 2001; 32: 2534–2542.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Carey L.M., Abbot D.F., Egan G.F. et al. Evolution of brain activation with good and poor motor recovery after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair 2006; 20: 24–41.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Carey L.M., Abbot D.F., Egan G.F. et al. Motor impairment and recovery in the upper limb after stroke: behavioral and neuroanatomical correlates. Stroke 2005; 36: 625–629.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Carusone L.M., Srinivasan J., Gitelman D.R. Restoring Neurological function: putting the neurosciences to work in neuroreabilitation. The Academy of Medical Sciences 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Catano A., Houa M., Caroyer J.M. et al. Magnetic transcranial stimulation in non-haemorrhagic sylvian strokes: interest of facilitation for early functional prognosis. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995; 97 (6): 349–354.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Chen R. Interactions between inhibitory and excitatory circuits in the human motor cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 2004; 154: 1–10.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Сhеn R., Сohеn L.G., Hаllett M. Nеrvous systеm геorgаnizаtiоn following injuгy. Neuroscience 2002; 11: 761–773.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Cholet F., DiPiero V., Wise R.J. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann. Neurol. 1991; 29: 63–71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Cicinelli P., Traversa R., Rossini P.M. Post-stroke reorganization of brain motor output to the hand: a 2–4 month follow-up with focal magnetic transcranial stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997; 105 (6): 438–450.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Classen J., Gerloff C., Honda M., Hallett M. Integrative visuomotor behavior is associated with interregionally coherent oscillations in the human brain. J. Neurophysiol. 1998; 79: 1567–1573.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Conturo T.E., Lori N.F., Cull T.S. et al. Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999; 96: 10422–10427.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Cramer S.C., Moore C.I., Finklestein S.P., Rosen B.R. A pilot study of somatotopic mapping after cortical infarct. Stroke 2000; 31: 668–671.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Cramer S.C., Nelles G., Benson R.R. et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 2518–2527.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Cramer S.C., Nelles G., Schaechter J.D. et al. A functional MRI study of three motor tasks in the evaluation of stroke recovery. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2001; 15: 1–8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Del Gratta C., Pizzella V., Tecchio F. et al. Magnetoencephalography: a noninvasive brain imaging method with 1 ms resolution. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2001; 64: 1759–1814.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Delvaux V., Alagona G., Gérard P. et al. Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003; 114 (7): 1217–1225.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Dhamala M., Pagnoni G., Wiesenfeld K. et al. Neural correlates of the complexity of rhythmic finger tapping. Neuroimage 2003; 20: 918–926.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Dobkin B.H. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol .2004; 3: 528–536.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Dum R.P., Strick P.L. Spinal cord terminations of the medial wall motor areas in macaque monkeys. J. Neurosci. 1996; 16: 6513–6525.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Dunсan P.W., Goldstеin L.B., Маtсhаr D. et al. Меasurement of motor recovery аftеr stгoke: outcome asses sment and samplе sizе requirmеnts. Stroke l992; 23: l084–1089.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Ferbert A., Priori A., Rothwell J.C. et al. Interhemispheric inhibition of the human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 1992; 453: 525–546.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Feydy A., Carlier R., Roby-Brami A. et al. Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 2002; 33: 1610–1617.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Gerloff C., Bushara K., Sailer A. et al. Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke. Brain 2006; 129: 791–808.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Gould H.J., Cusick C.G., Pons T.P., Kaas J.H. The relationship of corpus callosum connections to electrical stimulation maps of motor, supplementary motor, and the frontal eye fields in owl monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 1986; 247: 297–325.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Heald A., Bates D., Cartlidge N.E. et al. Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. Brain 1993; 116 (6): 1371–1385.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Hebb D.O. The organization of behavior: A neurophysiological theory. New York: Wiley, 1949.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Hummel F., Gerloff C. Larger interregional synchrony is associated with greater behavioral success in a complex sensory integration task in humans. Cereb. Cortex 2005; 15: 670–678.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Hummel F., Kirsammer R., Gerloff C. Ipsilateral cortical activation during finger sequences of increasing complexity: representation of movement difficulty or memory load? Clin. Neurophysiol. 2003; 114: 605–613.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Hutchinson S., Kobayashi M., Horkan C.M. et al. Age-related differences in movement representation. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 1720–1728.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Jaillard A., Martin C.D., Garambois K. et al. Vicarious function within the human primary motor cortex? A longitudinal fMRI stroke study. Brain 2005; 128 (5): 11122–11138.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Jang S.H., Ahn S.H., Ha J.S. et al. Peri-infarct reorganization in a patient with corona radiate infarct: a combined study of functional MRI and diffusion tensor image tractography. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2006; 24: 65–68.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Jang S.H., Cho S.H., Kim Y.H. et al. Cortical activation changes associated with motor recovery in patients with precentral knob infarct. Neuroreport 2004; 1: 15: 395–399.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Jang S.H., Cho S.H., Kim Y.H. et al. Diffusion anisotrophy in the early stages of stroke can predict motor outcome. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2005; 23: 11–17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Karni A., Meyer G., Jezzard P. et al. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 1995; 377: 155–158.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Khedr E.M., Ahmed M.A., Fathy N., Rothwell J.C. Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke. Neurology 2005; 65 (3): 466–468.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Kim Y.H., You S.H., Kwon Y.H. et al. Longitudinal fMRI study for locomotor recovery in patients with stroke. Neurology 2006; 67: 330–333.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Kleim J.A., Chan S., Pringle E. et al. BDNF val66met polymorphism is associated with modified experience-dependent plasticity in human motor cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2006; 9 (6): 735–737.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Kobayashi M., Ng J., Theoret H., Pascual-Leone A. Modulation of intracortical neuronal circuits in human hand motor area by digit stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 2003; 149: 1–8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Kocak M., Ulmer J.L., Ugurel M.S. et al. Motor Homunculus: Passive mapping in healthy volunteers by using functional MR Imaging—initial results. Radiology 2009; 251: 485–492.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Konishi J., Yamada K., Kizu O. et al. MR tractography for the evaluation of functional recovery from lenticulostriate infarcts. Neurology 2005; 64: 108–113.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>Kujirai T., Caramia M.D., Rothwell J.C. et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 1993; 471: 501–519.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Kunimatsu A., Aoki S., Masutani Y. et al. Three-dimensional white matter tractography by diffusion tensor imaging in ischaemic stroke involving the corticospinal tract. Neuroradiology 2003; 45: 532–535.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>Kunimatsu A., Aoki S., Masutani Y. et al. The optimal trackability threshold of fractional anisotropy for diffusion tensor tractography of the corticospinal tract. Magnetic resonance in medical sciences 2004; 1 (3): 11–17.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence D.G., Kuypers H.G. Pyramidal and non-pyramidal pathways in monkeys: anatomical and functional correlation. Science 1965; 148: 973–975.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Lawrence D.G., Kuypers H.G. The functional organization of the motor system in the monkey, I: the effect of bilateral pyramidal lesions. Brain 1968; 91: 1–14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Lee H., Gunraj C., Chen R. The effects of inhibitory and facilitatory intracortical circuits on interhemispheric inhibition in the human motor cortex. J. Physiol. 2007; 580: 1021–1032.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Lee J.S., Han M-K., Kim S.H. et al. Fiber tracking by diffusion tensor imaging in corticospinal tract stroke: Topographical correlation with clinical symptoms. NeuroImage 2005; 26: 771–776.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Leuner B., Falduto J., Shors T.J. Associative memory formation increases the observation of dendritic spines in the hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 2003; 23: 659–665.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Liepert J., Hamzei F., Weiller C. Motor cortex disinhibition of the unaffected hemisphere after acute stroke. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 1761–1763.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Liepert J., Restemeyer C., Kucinski T. et al.Motor strokes: the lesion location determines motor excitability changes. Stroke 2005; 36 (12): 2648–2653.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Logothetis N.K. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 2008; 453 (12): 869–878.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Lotze M., Markert J., Sauseng P. et al. The role of multiple contralesional motor areas for complex hand movements after internal capsular lesion. J. Neurosci. 2006; 26: 6096–6102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B66"><label>66.</label><mixed-citation>Macaluso E.B., Cherubini А., Sabatini U. Bimanual passive movement: functional activation and inter-regional coupling. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 2007; 1: article 5.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B67"><label>67.</label><mixed-citation>Manganotti P., Gerloff C., Toro C. et al. Task-related coherence and task-related spectral power changes during sequential finger movements. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998; 109: 50–62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B68"><label>68.</label><mixed-citation>Matthews P.M., Honey G.D., Bullmore E.T. Applications of fMRI in translational medicine and clinical practice. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2006; 7: 732–744.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B69"><label>69.</label><mixed-citation>Merzenich M.M., Jenkins W.M. Reorganization of cortical representations of the hand following alterations of skin inputs induced by nerve injury, skin island transfers, and experience. J. Hand Ther. 1993; 6: 89–104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B70"><label>70.</label><mixed-citation>Mima T., Matsuoka T., Hallett M. Information flow from the sensorimotor cortex to muscle in humans. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001a; 112: 122–126.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B71"><label>71.</label><mixed-citation>Mori S., van Zijl P.C. Fiber tracking: principles and strategies—a technical review. NMR Biomed. 2002; 15: 468–480.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B72"><label>72.</label><mixed-citation>Nardone R., Tezzon F. Inhibitory and excitatory circuits of cerebral cortex after ischaemic stroke: prognostic value of the transcranial magnetic stimulation. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002; 42 (3): 131–136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B73"><label>73.</label><mixed-citation>Nelles G., Jentzen W., Jueptner M. et al. Arm training induced brain plasticity in stroke studied with serial PET. Neuroimage 2001; 13 (6; 1): 1146–1154.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B74"><label>74.</label><mixed-citation>Newton J., Sunderland A., Butterworth S.E. et al. A pilot study of event related functional magnetic resonance imaging of monitored wrist movements in patients with partial recovery. Stroke 2002; 33: 2881–2887.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B75"><label>75.</label><mixed-citation>Newton J.M., Ward N.S., Parker G.J. et al. Non-invasive mapping corticofugal fibres from multiple motor areas – relevance to stroke recovery. Brain 2006; 129: 1844–1858.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B76"><label>76.</label><mixed-citation>Nudo R.J., Wise B.M., SiFuentes F., Milliken G.W. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science 1996; 272: 1791–1794.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B77"><label>77.</label><mixed-citation>Nudo R.J. Functional and structural plasticity in motor cortex: implications for stroke recovery. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2003; 14: S57–76.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B78"><label>78.</label><mixed-citation>Nudo R.J. Remodeling of cortical motor representations after stroke: implications for recovery from brain damage. Mol. Psychiatry 1997; 2 (3): 188–191.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B79"><label>79.</label><mixed-citation>Pennisi G., Rapisarda G., Bella R. et al. Absence of response to early transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke patients. Prognostic value for hand motor recovery. Stroke 1999; 30: 2666–2670.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B80"><label>80.</label><mixed-citation>Pineiro R., Pendlebury S., Johansen-Berg H., Matthews P.M. Functional MRI detects posterior shifts in primary sensorimotor cortex activation after stroke: evidence of local adaptive reorganization? Stroke 2001; 32: 1134–1139.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B81"><label>81.</label><mixed-citation>Plewnia C., Lotze M., Gerloff C. Disinhibition of the contralateral motor cortex by low-frequency rTMS. Neuroreport 2003; 14: 609–612.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B82"><label>82.</label><mixed-citation>Rogers B.P., Morgan V.L., Newton A.T., Gore J.C. Assessing functional connectivity in the human brain by fMRI. Magn. Reson Imaging 2007; 25 (10): 1347–1357.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B83"><label>83.</label><mixed-citation>Rossini P.M. Tracking post-stroke recovery with magnetoencephalography. Ann. Neurol. 2001; 49: 136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B84"><label>84.</label><mixed-citation>Rossini P.M., Caltagirone C., Castriota-Scanderberg A. et al. Hand motor cortical area reorganization in stroke: a study with f MRI, MEG and TMS maps. NeuroReport 1998; 9: 2141–2146.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B85"><label>85.</label><mixed-citation>Rossini P.M., Altamura C., Ferreri F. et al. Neuroimaging experimental studies on brain plasticity in recovery from stroke. Eura medicophys 2007; 43: 241–254.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B86"><label>86.</label><mixed-citation>Rossini P.M., Altamura C., Ferretti A. et al. Does cerebrovascular disease affect the coupling between neuronal activity and local haemodinamics? Brain 2004 (b); 127: 99–110.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B87"><label>87.</label><mixed-citation>Rossini P.M., Calautti C., Pauri F., Baron J.C. Post-stroke plastic reorganization in the adult brain. Lancet Neurol. 2003; 2: 493–502.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B88"><label>88.</label><mixed-citation>Rossini P.M., Caramia M., Zarola F. Central motor tract propagation in man: studies with non-invasive, unifocal scalp stimulation. Brain Res. 1987; 415: 211–225.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B89"><label>89.</label><mixed-citation>Rossini P.M., Dal Forno G. Integrated technology for evaluation of brain function and neural plasticity. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2004; 15: 263–306.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B90"><label>90.</label><mixed-citation>Rother J., Knab R., Hamzei F. et al. Negative dip BOLD fMRI is caused by blood flow – oxygen consumption uncoupling in humans. Neuroimage 2002; 15: 98–102.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B91"><label>91.</label><mixed-citation>Rouiller E.M., Moret V., Tanne J., Boussaoud D. Evidence for direct connections between the hand region of the supplementary motor area and cervical motoneurons in the macaque monkey. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1996; 8: 1055–1059.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B92"><label>92.</label><mixed-citation>Sadato N., Campbell G., Ibanez V. et al. Complexity affects regional cerebral blood flow change during sequential finger movements. J. Neurosci. 1996; 16: 2691–2700.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B93"><label>93.</label><mixed-citation>Seitz R.J., Hoflich P., Binkofski F. et al. Role of the premotor cortex in recovery from middle cerebral artery infarction. Arch. Neurol. 1998; 55: 1081–1088.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B94"><label>94.</label><mixed-citation>Shimizu T., Hosaki A., Hino T. et al. Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. Brain 2002; 125: 1896–1907.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B95"><label>95.</label><mixed-citation>Stefan K., Kunesch E., Benecke R., et al. Mechanisms of enhancement of human motor cortex excitability induced by interventional paired associative stimulation. J. Physiol. 2002; 543: 699–708.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B96"><label>96.</label><mixed-citation>Stefanovic B., Warnking J.M., Pike G.B. Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to neuronal inhibition. Neuroimage 2004; 22: 771–778.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B97"><label>97.</label><mixed-citation>Stinear C.M., Barber P.A., Smale PR et al. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain 2007 Jan.; 130 (1): 170–180.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B98"><label>98.</label><mixed-citation>Strick P.L. Anatomical organization of multiple motor areas in te frontal lobe: implications for recovery of function. Adv. Neurol. 1988; 47: 293–312.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B99"><label>99.</label><mixed-citation>Takeuchi N., Chuma T., Matsuo Y. et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke. Stroke 2005; 36 (12): 2681–2686.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B100"><label>100.</label><mixed-citation>Talelli P., Rothwell J. Does brain stimulation after stroke have a future? Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2006; 19: 543–550.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B101"><label>101.</label><mixed-citation>Tecchio F., Rossini P.M., Pizella V. et al. A neuromagnetic normative data set for hemispheric sensory hand cortical representations and thear interhemispheric differences. Brain Res. Brain Res. Protoc. 1998; 2: 306–314.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B102"><label>102.</label><mixed-citation>Tecchio F., Pasqualetti P., Zappasodi F. Prognostic value of magnetoencephalography parameters in acute monohemispheric stroke. J. Neurol. In press 2007.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B103"><label>103.</label><mixed-citation>Tecchio F., Rossini P.M., Pizzella V. Spatial properties and interhemispheric differences of the sensory hand cortical representation: a neuromagnetic study. Brain Res. 1997; 767: 100–108.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B104"><label>104.</label><mixed-citation>Thomalla G., Glauche V., Koch M.A. Diffusion tensor imaging detects early Wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract after ischemic stroke. Neuroimage 2004; 22: 1767–1774.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B105"><label>105.</label><mixed-citation>Traversa R., Cicinelli P., Bassi A. et al. Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke 1997; 28 (1): 110–117.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B106"><label>106.</label><mixed-citation>Turton A., Wroe S., Trepte N. et al. Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol 1996; 101 (4): 316–328.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B107"><label>107.</label><mixed-citation>107. Wang X.Q., Merzenich M.M., Sameshima K., Jenkins W.M. Remodeling of hand representation in adult cortex determined by timing of tactile stimulation. Nature 1995; 378: 71–75.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B108"><label>108.</label><mixed-citation>Ward N.S. Future perspectives in functional neuroimaging in stroke recovery. Eura. medicophys. 2007; 43: 285–294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B109"><label>109.</label><mixed-citation>Ward N.S., Brown M.M., Thompson A.J., Frackowiak R.S. Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. Brain 2003; 126: 1430–1448.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B110"><label>110.</label><mixed-citation>Ward N.S., Frackowiak R.S. The functional anatomy of cerebral reorganization after focal brain injury. J.Physiol. Paris 2006 (b); 99: 425–436.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B111"><label>111.</label><mixed-citation>Ward N.S., Newton J.M., Swayne O.B. et al. Motor system activation after subcortical stroke depends on corticospinal system integrity. Brain 2006; 129 (Pt3): 809–819.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B112"><label>112.</label><mixed-citation>Weder B., Knorr U., Herzog H. et al. Tactile exploration of shape after subcortical ischaemic infarction stadied with PET. Brain 1994; 11: 593–605.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B113"><label>113.</label><mixed-citation>Weiller C., Chollet F., Friston K.J. et al. Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann. Neurol. 1992; 31: 463–472.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B114"><label>114.</label><mixed-citation>Weiller C., Ramsay S.C., Wise R.J. et al. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann. Neurol. 1993; 33: 181–189.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
