<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2075-5473</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2409-2533</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">440</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17816/psaic440</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Reviews</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Обзоры</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Multiple sclerosis: modern conception of pathogenesis and treatment</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Рассеянный склероз: современная концепция патогенеза и патогенетического лечения</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Zavalishin</surname><given-names>I. A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Завалишин</surname><given-names>И. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>a.v.pesedova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Peresedova</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Переседова</surname><given-names>A. В.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>a.v.pesedova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Research Center of Neurology</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБНУ «Научный центр неврологии»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2007-03-14" publication-format="electronic"><day>14</day><month>03</month><year>2007</year></pub-date><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>32</fpage><lpage>40</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2017-02-07"><day>07</day><month>02</month><year>2017</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2007, Zavalishin I.A., Peresedova А.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2007, Zavalishin I.A., Peresedova А.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2007</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Zavalishin I.A., Peresedova А.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Zavalishin I.A., Peresedova А.V.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://annaly-nevrologii.com/pathID/article/view/440">https://annaly-nevrologii.com/pathID/article/view/440</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The current conception is that multiple sclerosis pathogenesis comprises an initial inflammatory phase, followed by a phase of demyelination and, last, a neurodegenerative phase. The mechh anisms of inflammatory reactions and axonal loss have been disscussed. The crucial role of the immune system in disease pathogenesis has important therapeutic implications. The immunological effects of glucocorticosteroids underlie the beneficial effect on multiple sclerosis relapse. Two classes of immunomodulators (interferon β, glatiramer acetate) are approved for long term treatment of multiple sclerosis. Immunosuppressive agents and immunoglobulins used in treatment have been shown to exert immunomodulatory effects. Future developments of multiple sclerosis therapy have been discussed.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p>Концепция патогенеза рассеянного склероза в настоящее время включает выделение начальной воспалительной фазы, сопровождающейся фазой демиелинизации, а затем фазой нейродегенерации. В статье рассматриваются механизмы иммуновоспалительных реакций и аксонального повреждения при рассеянном склерозе. Определяющая роль иммунной системы в патогенезе заболевания определяет терапевтические подходы. Иммунологические эффекты глюкокортикостероидов обусловливают их положительное влияние при обострении болезни. Для длительной терапии, модулирующей течение рассеянного склероза, широко используются две группы препаратов (интерфероны бета и глатирамера ацетат). Назначение цитостатических препаратов и иммуноглобулинов при данном заболевании также определяется их иммуномодулирующими эффектами. Обсуждаются перспективы патогенетической терапии рассеянного склероза.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>multiple sclerosis</kwd><kwd>pathogenesis</kwd><kwd>therapy</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>рассеянный склероз</kwd><kwd>патогенез</kwd><kwd>лечение</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Бархатова В.П., Завалишин И.А., Хайдаров Б.Т. Нейротрансмиттеры в механизмах связи между нервной и иммунной системами при рассеянном склерозе. Журн. невролог. и психиатрии им. С.С.Корсакова 1998; 11: 51–54.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Гусев Е.И., Демина Т.Л., Бойко А.Н. Рассеянный склероз. М.: Нефть и газ, 1997. 463 с.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Завалишин И.А., Захарова М.Н. Рассеянный склероз: основные аспекты патогенеза. В кн.: Гусев Е.И., Завалишин И.А., Бойко А.Н. (ред.) Рассеянный склероз и другие демиелинизирующие заболевания. М.: Миклош, 2004: 60–74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Aharoni R., Arnon R., Eilam R. Neurogenesis and neuroprotection induced by peripheral immunomodulatory treatment of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neurosci. 2005; 25: 8217–8228.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Aharoni R., Kayhan B., Eilam R. et al. Glatiramer acetate specific T-cells in the brain express T-helper 2/3 cytokines and brain derived neurotrophic factor in situ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2003; 100: 14157–14162.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Araque A., Parpura V., Sanzgiri R.P., Haydon P.G. Tripartite synapses: glia, the unacknowledged partner. Trends. Neurosci. 1999; 22: 208–215.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Bielekova B., Goodwin B., Richert N. et al. Encephalitogenic potential of the myelin basic protein peptide (amino acids 83399) in multiple sclerosis: results of a phase II clinical trial with an altered peptide ligand. Nat. Med. 2000; 6: 1167–1175.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Biernacki K., Antel J.P., Blain M. et al. Interferon beta promotes nerve growth factor secretion early in the course of multiple sclerosis. Arch. Neurol. 2005; 62: 563–568.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Boutros T., Croze E., Yong V.W. Interferon b is a potent promoter of nerve growth factor production by astrocytes. J. Neurochem. 1997; 69: 939–946.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Brown KA. Factors modifying the migration of lymphocytes across the blood brain barrier. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2001; 1: 2043–2062.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Clanet M., Montalban X. (chairmen). The future of multiple sclerosis therapies. PAREXEL MMS Europe Ltd. 2006: 51 p.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Compston A. Mechanisms of axon-glial injury of the optic nerve. Eye 2004; 18: 1182–1187.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Compston A., Coles A. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2002; 359: 1221–1231.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Cuzner M.L. Molecular biology of microglia. In: Russel W.C. (ed.) Molecular biology of multiple sclerosis. England: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd., 1997: 97–120.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Dong C., Flavell R.A. Cell fate decision: T-helper 1 and 2 subsets in immune responses. Arthritis Res. 2000; 2: 179–188.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Ebers G., Traboulsee A., Li D. et al. Final results from the interferon betaa1b 166year longgterm follow up study. Mult. Scler. 2006; 12, Suppl. 1: S. 189 (P666).</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>European Study Group on Interferon betaa1b in Secondary Progressive MS. Placeboocontrolled multicenter randomized trial of interferon bb1b in treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1998; 352: 1491–1497.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Felts P.A. The role of ion channel distribution, dysfunction and gene expression in demyelinating disease. In: Rose M., Griggs R. (eds.) Channelopathies of the nervous system. Bodmin: MPG Books Ltd., 2001: 125–137.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Filippi M., Bozzali M., Rovaris M. et al. Evidence for widespread axonal damage at the earliest clinical stage of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2003; 126: 433–437.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Filippi M., Rovaris M., Rocca M.M. et al. European/Canadian Glatiramer Acetate Study Group. Glatiramer acetate reduces the proportion of new MS lesions evolving into “black holes”. Neurology 2001; 57: 731–733.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Ford C.C., Johnson K.P., Lisak R.P. et al. A prospective open label study of glatiramer acetate: over a decade of continuous use in multiple sclerosis patients. Mult. Scler. 2006; 12: 309–320.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Fossier P., Blanchard B., Ducrocq C. et al. Nitric oxide transforms serotonin into an active form and this affects neuromodulation. Neuroscience 1999; 93: 597–603.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Gold R., Buttgereit F., Toyka K.V. Mechanism of action of glucocorticosteroid hormones: possible implications for therapy of neuroimmunological disorders. J. Neuroimmunol. 2001; 117: 1–8.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Gonsette R.E. Combination therapy for multiple sclerosis. Int. MS J. 2004; 11: 10–21.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Hemmer B., Archelos J.J., Hartung H..P. New concepts in the immunopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002; 3: 291–301.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Hohlfeld R. Biotechnological agents for the immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis. Principles, problems and perspectives [Invited review]. Brain 1997; 120: 865–916.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Hohlfeld R., Kerchensteiner M., Stadelmann C. et al. The neuroprotective effect of inflammation: implications for the therapy of multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2000; 107: 161–166.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Hohlfeld R., Wekerle H. Drug insight: using monoclonal antibodies to treat multiple sclerosis. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2005; 1: 34–44.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Jacobs L.D., Cookfair D.L., Rudick R.A. et al. Intramuscular interferon betaa1a for disease progression in exacerbating remitting mulltiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 1996; 39: 285–294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Johnson K.P., Brooks B.R., Cohen J.A. et al. Copolymer 1 reduces relapse rate and improves disability in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: results of a phase III multicenter, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 1995; 45: 1268–1276.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Johnson K.P., Calabresi P.A. Interferonnbb1b: prophylactic therapy in multiple sclerosis. In: Cook S.D. (ed.) Handbook of multiple sclerosis. 3d ed. Marcel Dekker Inc., 2001: 503–518.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Kappos L., Traboulsee A., Constantinescu C. et al. Long-term subcutaneous interferon beta-1a therapy in patients with relapsing remitting MS. Neurology 2006; 67: 930–931. 33. Kara P., Freidlander M.J. Dynamic modulation of cerebral cortex synaptic function by nitric oxide. Prog. Brain Res. 1998; 118: 183–198.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Kerschensteiner M., Stadelmann C., Dechant G. et al. Neurotrofic cross talk between the nervous and immune systems: implications for neurological diseases. Ann. Neurol. 2003; 53: 292–304.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Kornek B., Storch M., Bauer J. et al. Distribution of calcium channel subunit in dystrophic axons in multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Brain 2001; 124: 1114–1124.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Kwak B., Mulhaupt F., Myit S., Mach F. Statins as a newly recognized type of immunomodulator. Nat. Med. 2000; 6: 1399–1402.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Lassmann H., Bruck W., Lucchinett C. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis pathogenesis: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Trends Mol. Med. 2001; 7: 115–121.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>LoPachin R., Lehning E. Mechanisms of calcium entry during axon injury and degeneration. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1997; 143: 233–244.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Lucchinetti C., Bruck W., Parisi J. et al. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination. Ann. Neurol. 2000; 47: 707–717.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Miller D.H., Khan O.A., Sheremata W.A. et al. A controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003; 348: 15–23.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Morrissey S.P., Le Page E., Edan G. Mitoxantrone in the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Int. MS J. 2005; 12: 74–87.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Neuhaus O., Archelos J.J., Hartung H..P. Immunomodulation in multiple sclerosis: from immunosuppression to neuroprotection. TRENDS Pharmacol. Sci. 2003; 24: 131–138.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Neuhaus O., Farina C., Wekerle H., Hohlfeld R. Mechanism of action of glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2001; 56: 702–708.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Neuhaus O., Strasser-Fuchs S., Fazekas F. et al. Statins as immunomodulators: comparison with interferon-beta 1b in MS. Neurology 2002; 59: 990–997.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Neuhaus O., Wiendl H., Kieseier B.C. et al. Multiple sclerosis: mitoxantrone promoted differential effects on immunocompetent cells in vitro. J. Neuroimmunol. 2005; 168: 128–137.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Neumann H., Cavalie A., Jenne D., Wekerle H. Induction of MHC class I genes in neurons. Science 1995; 269: 549–552.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Panitch H. Prophylactic therapy – glatiramer acetate (Copaxone). In: Cook S.D. (ed.) Handbook of multiple sclerosis. 3d ed. Marcel Dekker Inc., 2001: 541–560.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Paz Soldan M.M., Rodriguez M. Heterogeneity of pathogenesis in multiple sclerosis: implications for promotion of remyelination. The Journal of infections diseases 2002; 186, Suppl. 2: S. 248–253.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Perumal J., Filippi M., Ford C. Glatiramer acetate therapy for multiple sclerosis: a review. Expert. Opin. Drug. Metab. Toxicol. 2006; 2: 1019–1029.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Polman C., Barkhof F., Kappos L. et al. Oral interferon betaa1a in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: a double blind randomised study. Mult. Scler. 2003; 9: 342–348.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>PRISMS Study Group. Randomized double blind placebo-controlled study of interferon bb1a in relapsing/remitting multiple sclerosis. Lancet 1998; 352: 1498–1504.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Rieckmann P., Maurer M. Anti-inflammatory strategies to prevent axonal injury in multiple sclerosis. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2002; 15: 361–370.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Sawcer S., Maranian M., Setakis E. et al. A whole genome screen for linkage disequilibrium in multiple sclerosis confirms disease associations with regions previously linked to susceptibility. Brain 2002; 125: 1337–1347.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Serono International S.A. The pathophysiology of MS and mode of action of interferon beta. DVDDvideo. 2004.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B54"><label>54.</label><mixed-citation>SPECTRIMS Study Group. Randomized controlled trial of interferon- beta 1a in secondary progressive MS. Clinical results. Neurology 2001; 56: 1496–1504.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B55"><label>55.</label><mixed-citation>Steinman L. Multiple sclerosis: a two stage disease. Natl. Immunol. 2001; 2: 762–764.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B56"><label>56.</label><mixed-citation>The IFNB Multiple Sclerosis Study Group. Interferon beta 1b is effective in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: I. Clinical results of a multicentral, randomized double-bind, placebo-controlled trial. Neurology 1993; 43: 655–661.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B57"><label>57.</label><mixed-citation>Trapp B.D., Ransohoff R.M., Fisher E., Rudick R.A. Neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis: relationship to neurological disability. Neuroscientist 1999; 5: 48–57.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B58"><label>58.</label><mixed-citation>Venken K., Hellings N., Hensen K. et al. Secondary progressive in contrast to relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients show a normal CD4+CD25+ regulatory TTcell function and FOXP3 expression. J. Neurosci. Res. 2006; 83: 1432–1446.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B59"><label>59.</label><mixed-citation>Villoslada P., Hauser S.L., Bartke I. et al. Human nerve growth factor protects common marmosets against autoimmune encephalomyelitis by switching the balance of T helper cell type 1 and 2 cytokines within the central nervous system. J. Exp. Med. 2000; 191: 1799–1806.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B60"><label>60.</label><mixed-citation>Wang S., Cheng Q., Malik S., Yang J. Interleukin-1beta inhibits gammaaaminobutyric acid type A (GABA (A)) receptor current in cultured hippocampal neurons. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2000; 292: 497–504.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B61"><label>61.</label><mixed-citation>Weitz Schmidt G., Welzenbach K., Brinkmann V. et al. Statins selectively inhibit leukocyte function antigen 1 by binding to a novel regulatory integrin site. Nat. Med. 2001; 7: 687–692.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B62"><label>62.</label><mixed-citation>Wiles C.M., Brown P., Chapel H. et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin in neurological disease: a specialist review. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002; 72: 440–448.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B63"><label>63.</label><mixed-citation>Yong V.W. Differential mechanisms of action of interferonnb and glatiramer acetate in MS. Neurology 2002; 59: 802–808.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B64"><label>64.</label><mixed-citation>Yong V.W., Chabot S., Stuve O., Williams G. Interferon beta in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: mechanisms of action. Neurology 1998; 51: 682–689.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B65"><label>65.</label><mixed-citation>Ziemssen T., Kumpfel T., Klinkert W.E. et al. Glatiramer acetatee specific T-helper 11 and 22 type cell lines produce BDNF: implications for multiple sclerosis therapy. Brain derived neurotrophic factor. Brain 2002; 125: 2381–2391.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
