<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2075-5473</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2409-2533</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">601</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25692/ACEN.2019.3.3</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Analysis of factors affecting adherence to treatment in post-stroke patients</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Анализ факторов, влияющих на приверженность к терапии постинсультных больных</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bogolepova</surname><given-names>Anna N.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Боголепова</surname><given-names>Анна Николаевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>ekaterinakov90@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kovalenko</surname><given-names>Ekaterina A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Коваленко</surname><given-names>Екатерина Андреевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>ekaterinakov90@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБОУ ВО «Российский национальный исследовательский медицинский университет имени Н.И. Пирогова»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2019-08-06" publication-format="electronic"><day>06</day><month>08</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>20</fpage><lpage>27</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2019-09-01"><day>01</day><month>09</month><year>2019</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2019, Bogolepova A.N., Kovalenko E.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2019, Bogolepova A.N., Kovalenko E.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2019</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bogolepova A.N., Kovalenko E.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Bogolepova A.N., Kovalenko E.A.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://annaly-nevrologii.com/pathID/article/view/601">https://annaly-nevrologii.com/pathID/article/view/601</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Introduction. </bold>The effectiveness of secondary stroke prevention depends not only on the prescribed medications but also on patients’ compliance with doctors’ recommendations in general. Adherence to therapy among post-stroke patients remains insufficient. This is due to factors that negatively affect compliance with medical recommendations. Among those factors, post-stroke cognitive impairment deserves particular attention.</p> <p><bold>Study</bold> <bold>aim</bold> – to identify the main factors that determine adherence to long-term therapy in patients after stroke and to assess the impact of post-stroke cognitive impairment on compliance with medical recommendations.</p> <p><bold>Materials and methods. </bold>A total of 56 patients (mean age 64.67±10.19 years), who experienced a hemispheric ischaemic stroke 6 months ago, were examined. Cognitive function was evaluated using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment tool, the battery of tests to assess frontal dysfunction, drawing and clock copying tests, and tests of phonetic and semantic speech activity. Adherence to long-term therapy after stroke was determined using the Morisky–Green test. We also studied the role of sociodemographic and vascular risk factors, that determine treatment adherence.</p> <p><bold>Results. </bold>More than half (51.8%) of post-stroke patients did not comply with medical recommendations. The main barriers to optimal adherence were the male gender, engagement in physical labour throughout life, and the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy, chronic heart failure or bad health habits. The presence of post-stroke cognitive impairment had a negative impact on the adherence to medical recommendations (<italic>r</italic>=0.49; <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.001). The results of the survey showed that regular visits to medical specialists were one of the main requirements for maintaining optimal adherence to treatment. Most patients (59.6%) thought that forgetfulness is a key factor affecting adherence to therapy.</p> <p><bold>Summary. </bold>Treatment adherence should be evaluated in all patients after stroke, especially in those with post-stroke cognitive impairment. The identification and correction of ‘modifiable’ risk factors is a way to increase adherence to treatment</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Введение. </bold>Эффективность вторичной профилактики инсульта зависит не только от действия лекарственных препаратов, но и от выполнения пациентом врачебных назначений. Приверженность к терапии постинсультных больных остается недостаточной. Это связано с факторами, отрицательно влияющими на соблюдение медицинских рекомендаций, среди которых особого внимания заслуживают постинсультные когнитивные нарушения (ПИКН).</p> <p><bold>Цель исследования</bold> — выявить основные факторы, определяющие приверженность к длительной терапии пациентов после инсульта и оценить влияние ПИКН на соблюдение медицинских рекомендаций.</p> <p><bold>Материалы и методы. </bold>Обследовано 56 больных (средний возраст 64,67±10,19 года), перенесших 6 мес назад полушарный ишемический инсульт. Состояние когнитивной сферы оценивали с использованием Монреальской шкалы оценки когнитивных функций, батареи тестов для оценки лобной дисфункции, тестов рисования и копирования часов, тестов на фонетическую и семантическую речевую активность. Приверженность к длительной терапии после инсульта определяли с помощью опросника Мориски–Грина. Изучена роль социально-демографических и сосудистых факторов риска, определяющих приверженность к терапии. </p> <p><bold>Результаты. </bold>Более половины (51,8%) постинсультных пациентов не соблюдали медицинские рекомендации. Основными барьерами на пути к оптимальной приверженности были мужской пол, выполнение физического труда в течение жизни, наличие гипертрофии миокарда левого желудочка, хронической сердечной недостаточности, вредных привычек. Наличие ПИКН негативно сказывается на выполнении медицинских рекомендаций (<italic>r</italic>=0,49; <italic>p</italic>&lt;0,001). Результаты анкетирования показали, что регулярное посещение медицинских специалистов является одним из основных условий поддержания оптимальной приверженности к лечению. По мнению большинства пациентов (59,6%), ключевой фактор, влияющий на приверженность к терапии, — это забывчивость.</p> <p><bold>Выводы. </bold>Приверженность к терапии необходимо оценивать у всех больных, перенесших инсульт, особенно у пациентов с ПИКН. Выявление и коррекция «модифицируемых» факторов риска — это путь к повышению приверженности к лечению. </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>stroke</kwd><kwd>post-stroke cognitive impairment</kwd><kwd>risk factors</kwd><kwd>adherence to treatment</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>инсульт</kwd><kwd>постинсультные когнитивные нарушения</kwd><kwd>факторы риска</kwd><kwd>приверженность к терапии</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gusev E.I., Skvortsova V.I., Martynov M.Yu., Kamchatnov P.R. [Cerebral stroke: problems and solutions]. Vestnik RGMU 2006; (4): 28–32. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гусев Е.И., Скворцова В.И., Мартынов М.Ю., Камчатнов П.Р. Церебральный инсульт: проблемы и решения. Вестник РГМУ 2006; (4): 28–32.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Suslina Z.A., Piradov M.A., Domashenko M.A. [Stroke: the review of the problem (15 years after)]. Zhurnal nevrologii i psikhiatrii im. S.S. Korsakova 2014; 114(11): 5–13. PMID: 25591629. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Суслина З.А., Пирадов М.А., Домашенко М.А. Инсульт: оценка проблемы (15 лет спустя). Журнал неврологии и психиатрии им. С.С. Корсакова 2014; 114(11): 5–13. PMID: 25591629.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Crayton E., Fahey M., Ashworth M. et al. Psychological determinants of medication adherence in stroke survivors: a systematic review of observational studies. Ann Behav Med 2017; 51: 833–845. DOI: 10.1007/s12160-017-9906-0. PMID: 28421453.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>De Geest S., Sabaté E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2003; 2: 323. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-5151(03)00091-4. PMID: 14667488.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Brown M.T., Bussell J.K. Medication adherence: WHO cares? Mayo Clinic Proc 2011; 86: 304–314. DOI: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0575. PMID: 21389250.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>McDonnell P.J., Jacobs M.R. Hospital admissions resulting from preventable adverse drug reactions. Ann Pharmacother 2002; 36: 1331–1336. DOI: 10.1345/aph.1A333. PMID: 12196047.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Chen P.S., Cheng C.L., Yang Y.H.K., Li Y.H. Statin adherence after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack is associated with clinical outcome. Circ J 2016; 80: 731–737. DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0753. PMID: 26742588.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Mugwano I., Kaddumukasa M., Mugenyi L. et al. Poor drug adherence and lack of awareness of hypertension among hypertensive stroke patients in Kampala, Uganda: a cross sectional study. BMC Res Notes 2016; 9: 3. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-015-1830-4. PMID: 26725042.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sokolova N.Yu. [Adherence to therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease after various revascularizing operations]. Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya 2019; 12(1): 25–30. DOI: 10.17116/kardio20191201125. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Соколова Н.Ю. Приверженность к терапии у пациентов со стабильной ИБС после различных реваскуляризирующих операций. Кардиология и сердечно-сосудистая хирургия 2019; 12(1): 25–30. DOI: 10.17116/kardio20191201125.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Kumbhani D.J., Fonarow G.C., Cannon C.P. et al. Predictors of adherence to performance measures in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med 2013; 126: 74. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.02.025. PMID: 22925314.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Jokisalo E., Enlund H., Halonen P. et al. Factors related to poor control of blood pressure with antihypertensive drug therapy. Blood Press 2003; 12: 4955. PMID: 12699136.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Oates D.J., Paasche-Orlow M.K. Health literacy: communication strategies to improve patient comprehension of cardiovascular health. Circulation 2009; 119: 1049–1051. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.818468. PMID: 19237675.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Botelho R.J., Dudrak R. Home assessment of adherence to long-term medication in the elderly. J Fam Pract 1992: 35: 61–66. PMID: 1613477.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Mann D.M., Allegrante J.P., Natarajan S. et al. Predictors of adherence to statins for primary prevention. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 2007; 21: 311–316. DOI: 10.1007/s10557-007-6040-4. PMID: 17665294.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Kim M.T., Han H.R., Hill M.N. et al. Depression, substance use, adherence behaviors, and blood pressure in urban hypertensive black men. Ann Behav Med 2003; 26: 2431. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_04. PMID: 12867351.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Foot H., La Caze A., Gujral G., Cottrell N. The necessity-concerns framework predicts adherence to medication in multiple illness conditions: A meta-analysis. Patient Educ Couns 2016; 99: 706–717. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.11.004. PMID: 26613666.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Rodriguez F.C.C., Steg P.G., Kubhani D.J. et al. Predictors of long-term adherence to evidence-based cardiovascular disease medications in outpatient with stable atherotrombotic disease: findings from the REACH Registry. Clin Cardiol 2013; 16: 721–727. DOI: 10.1002/clc. 22217.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Delamater A.M. Improving patient adherence. Clin Diabetes 2006; 24: 71–77. DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.24.2.71.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lihodey N.V., Kalashnikova M.F., Lihodey E.M., Fadeev V.V. [Analysis of the factors that prevent adherence to treatment in patients with diabetes mellitus and the strategies that contribute to the improvement in adherence]. Diabetes Mellitus 2018; 21(1): 5–14. DOI: 10.14341/DM8781. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лиходей Н.В., Калашникова М.Ф., Лиходей Е.М., Фадеев В.В. Анализ факторов, препятствующих формированию приверженности лечению среди больных сахарным диабетом, и стратегий, способствующих ее повышению. Сахарный диабет 2018; 21(1): 5–14. DOI: 10.14341/DM8781.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Mellon L., Brewer L., Hall P. et al. Cognitive impairment six months after ischaemic stroke: a profile from the ASPIRE-S study. BMC Neurol 2015; 15: 31. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-015-0288-2. PMID: 25879880.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zaharov V.V., Vahnina N.V., Gromova D.O. et al. [Diagnostic and treatment of cognitive impairment after stroke]. Medicinskiy sovet 2015; (10): 14–20. DOI: 10.21518/2079-701X-2015-10-14-21. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Захаров В.В., Вахнина Н.В., Громова Д.О. и др. Диагностика и лечение когнитивных нарушений после инсульта. Медицинский совет 2015; (10): 14–20. DOI: 10.21518/2079-701X-2015-10-14-21.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tanashyan M.M., Konovalov R.N., Lagoda O.V. [New approaches to correction of cognitive disorders in cerebrovascular diseases]. Annals of clinical and experimental neurology 2018; 12(3): 30–39. DOI: 10.25692/ACEN.2018.3.4. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Танашян М.М., Коновалов Р.Н., Лагода О.В. Новые подходы к коррекции когнитивных нарушений при цереброваскулярных заболеваниях. Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии 2018; 12(3): 30–39. DOI: 10.25692/ACEN.2018.3.4.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bogolepova A.N. [Cognitive impairment in patients with cerebrovascular disease]. Lechenie zabolevaniy nervnoy sistemy 2011; 3(3): 16–22. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Боголепова А.Н. Когнитивные нарушения у больных с цереброваскулярной патологией. Лечение заболеваний нервной системы 2011; 3(3): 16–22.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kulesh A.A., Shestakov V.V. [Vascular cognitive impairment, no dementia: diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and prevention]. Nevrologiya, neiropsikhiatriya, psikhosomatika 2017; 9(3): 68–75. DOI: 10.14412/2074-2711-2017-3-68-75. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кулеш А.А., Шестаков В.В. Сосудистые недементные когнитивные нарушения: диагноз, прогноз, лечение и профилактика. Неврология, нейропсихиатрия, психосоматика 2017; 9(3): 68–75. DOI: 10.14412/2074-2711-2017-3-68-75.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Campbell N.L., Zhan J., Tu W. et al. Self-reported medication adherence barriers among ambulatory older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Pharmacotherapy 2016; 36: 196–202. DOI: 10.1002/phar.1702. PMID: 26890914.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Goldstein L.B., Bertels C., Davis J.N. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol 1989; 46: 660–662. DOI:10.1001/archneur.1989.00520420080026. PMID: 2730378.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Mahoney F., Barthel D. Functional evaluation: the Barthel lndex. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61–65. PMID: 14258950.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Nasreddine Z.S., Phillips N.A., Bédirian V. et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005; 53: 695–699. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. PMID: 15817019.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Dubois B., Slachevsky A., Litvan I., Pillon B. The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology 2000; 55: 1621–1626. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.55.11.1621. PMID: 11502945.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Hamilton M. The Hamilton rating scale for depression. Assessment of depression. Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986: 143–152. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-70486-4_14.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Morisky D.E., Green L.W., Levine D.M. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care 1986; 24: 67–74. PMID: 3945130.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zhuravskaya N.Yu., Kutishenko N.P., Martsevich S.Yu. et al. [Study of the physician recommendation adherence in patients after stroke. The role of anxiety and depression (registry LIS-2)]. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika 2015; 14(2): 46–51. DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2015-2-46-51. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Журавская Н.Ю., Кутишенко Н.П., Марцевич С.Ю. и др. Изучение приверженности врачебным рекомендациям пациентов, перенесших мозговой инсульт. роль тревоги и депрессии (результаты регистра ЛИС-2). Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2015; 14(2): 46–51. DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2015-2-46-51.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Erkens J.A., Panneman M.M., Klungel O.H. et al. Differences in antihypertensive drug persistence associated with drug class and gender: a PHARMO study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2005; 14: 795–803. DOI: 10.1002/pds.1156. PMID: 16178043.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Hauptman P.J. Medication adherence in heart failure. Heart Fail Rev 2008; 13: 99–106. DOI: 10.1007/s10741-007-9020-7. PMID: 17479364.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Jankowska-Polańska B., Katarzyna L., Lidia A. et al. Cognitive function and adherence to anticoagulation treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Geriatr Cardiol 2016; 13: 559. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.07.006. PMID: 27605935.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Hawkins L.A., Kilian S., Firek A. et al. Cognitive impairment and medication adherence in outpatients with heart failure. Heart Lung 2012; 41: 572–582. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2012.06.001. PMID: 22784869.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Thiruchselvam T., Nagile G., Moineddin R. et al. Risk factors for medication nonadherence in older adults with cognitive impairment who live alone. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012; 27:1275–1282. DOI: 10.1002/gps.3778. PMID: 22337284.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Semenova O.N., Naumova E.A. [Factors affecting on medication adherence: WHO parameters and the opinion of patients in the cardiology department]. Byulleten' meditsinskikh internet-konferentsiy 2013; 3(3): 507–511. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Семенова О.Н., Наумова Е.А. Факторы, влияющие на приверженность к терапии: параметры ВОЗ и мнение пациентов кардиологического отделения. Бюллетень медицинских интернет-конференций 2013; 3(3): 507–511.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Hines R., Stone N.J. Patients and physicians beliefs and practices regarding adherence to cardiovascular medication. JAMA Cardiol 2016; 1: 470–473. DOI: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0634. PMID: 27438324.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lukina Yu.V., Dmitrieva N.A., Kutishenko N.P. et al. [The relationship and interinfluence of aspects of therapy safety and compliance in patients with cardiovascular diseases (by the data from outpatient registry “PROFILE”)]. Kardiovaskulyarnaya terapiya i profilaktika 2018; 17(5): 72–78. DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2018-5-72-78. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лукина Ю.В., Дмитриева Н.А., Кутишенко Н.П. и др. Взаимосвязь и взаимовлияние аспектов безопасности лекарственного лечения и приверженности терапии у больных сердечно-сосудистыми заболеваниями (по данным амбулаторного регистра “ПРОФИЛЬ”). Кардиоваскулярная терапия и профилактика 2018; 17(5): 72–78. DOI: 10.15829/1728-8800-2018-5-72-78.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list></back></article>
