<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE root>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="other" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Анналы клинической и экспериментальной неврологии</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2075-5473</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2409-2533</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Eco-Vector</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">652</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25692/ACEN.2020.2.1</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Original articles</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Оригинальные статьи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Unknown</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Poststroke Hemianopia</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Транскраниальная стимуляция постоянным током при постинсультной гемианопсии</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0716-3737</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Bakulin</surname><given-names>Ilya S.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Бакулин</surname><given-names>Илья Сергеевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Cand. Sci. (Med.), researcher, Department of neurorehabilitation and physiotherapy</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.м.н., н.с. отд. нейрореабилитации и физиотерапии</p></bio><email>bakulin@neurology.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9267-8315</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Lagoda</surname><given-names>Dmitry Yu.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Лагода</surname><given-names>Дмитрий Юрьевич</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>junior researcher, Department of neurorehabilitation and physiotherapy</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>м.н.с. отд. нейрореабилитации и физиотерапии</p></bio><email>bakulin@neurology.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1841-1177</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Poydasheva</surname><given-names>Alexandra G.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пойдашева</surname><given-names>Александра Георгиевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>junior researcher, neurologist, Department of neurorehabilitation and physiotherapy</p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>м.н.с., врач-невролог отд. нейрореабилитации и физиотерапии</p></bio><email>bakulin@neurology.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Kremneva</surname><given-names>Elena I.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кремнева</surname><given-names>Елена Игоревна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>bakulin@neurology.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Suponeva</surname><given-names>Natalia A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Супонева</surname><given-names>Наталья Александровна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>bakulin@neurology.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Piradov</surname><given-names>Mikhail A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Пирадов</surname><given-names>Михаил Александрович</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Russian Federation</country></address><email>bakulin@neurology.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Research Center of Neurology</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">ФГБНУ «Научный центр неврологии»</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2020-06-24" publication-format="electronic"><day>24</day><month>06</month><year>2020</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="en"/><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>5</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2020-06-11"><day>11</day><month>06</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; 2020, Bakulin I.S., Lagoda D.Y., Poydasheva A.G., Kremneva E.I., Suponeva N.A., Piradov M.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; 2020, Bakulin I.S., Lagoda D.Y., Poydasheva A.G., Kremneva E.I., Suponeva N.A., Piradov M.A.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Bakulin I.S., Lagoda D.Y., Poydasheva A.G., Kremneva E.I., Suponeva N.A., Piradov M.A.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Bakulin I.S., Lagoda D.Y., Poydasheva A.G., Kremneva E.I., Suponeva N.A., Piradov M.A.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://annaly-nevrologii.com/pathID/article/view/652">https://annaly-nevrologii.com/pathID/article/view/652</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Introduction. </bold>Development of the new approaches to the rehabilitation of patients with poststroke hemianopia is of great importance, given the high prevalence of that disorder and its negative impact on patients’ quality of life.</p> <p><bold>This study aimed</bold> to investigate the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the quality of life and the quality of visual perception in patients with poststroke hemianopia, as well as to study the safety and tolerability of this technique.</p> <p><bold>Materials and methods. </bold>The study included ten patients with poststroke hemianopia. Patients underwent ten tDCS sessions (2 mA, 20 min with anode placed over Oz, cathode — over Cz for a unilateral lesion, and anode — over O1 and O2, cathode — over Fp1 and Fp2 for bilateral lesions). The tolerability of tDCS was evaluated after each session using a standardized questionnaire. Clinical assessment before and after tDCS was performed using the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) and the 36-item Short Form Survey (SF-36). Functional MRI using a visual paradigm was performed in 5 patients before and after the course of tDCS.</p> <p><bold>Results.</bold> Adverse effects were recorded during 9.9% of the sessions and had low severity in most cases. There was one withdrawal from the study because of increased pain in the hand and leg, in a patient with central post-stroke pain syndrome, which was likely unrelated to the biological effects of stimulation. Data of 9 patients were included in the analysis. There was a statistically significant increase in the overall score on the VFQ-25 (p = 0.02) after tDCS with improvements in the social activity (p = 0.02), mental health (p = 0.02), dependence on others (p = 0.04), and peripheral vision (p = 0.04) sections. A statistically significant improvement was also found in the psychological component of quality of life (p = 0.04), vitality (p = 0.03), social functioning (p = 0.02), role functioning due to physical health (p = 0.04), and general health (p = 0.008). In 3 cases, increased activation of the occipital cortex after tDCS was identified using functional MRI with a visual paradigm.</p> <p><bold>Conclusion.</bold> tDCS is a safe, well-tolerated, and potentially effective method in patients with poststroke hemianopia. Larger, controlled, and randomized studies are needed to clarify the efficacy of this method in hemianopia.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Введение. </bold>Разработка новых подходов к реабилитации пациентов с постинсультной гемианопсией является актуальной задачей, учитывая высокую частоту встречаемости и негативное влияние этого нарушения на качество жизни пациентов.</p> <p><bold>Цель</bold> исследования — изучение влияния транскраниальной электрической стимуляции постоянным током (tDCS) на качество жизни и качество зрительного восприятия у пациентов с постинсультной гемианопсией, анализ безопасности и переносимости этого метода.</p> <p> </p> <p><bold>Материалы и методы. </bold>В исследование было включено 10 пациентов с постинсультной гемианопсией. Пациентам проводили 10 сессий tDCS (2 мА, 20 мин анод — Oz, катод — Сz при одностороннем поражении и анод — О1 и О2, катод — Fp1 и Fp2 при двустороннем). Переносимость tDCS оценивали после каждой сессии с помощью стандартизированного опросника. Клиническая оценка до и после курса tDCS проводилась с применением опросника для оценки качества зрительного восприятия Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) и опросника для оценки качества жизни The Short Form-36 (SF-36). У 5 пациентов до и после курса tDCS проводилась функциональная МРТ со зрительной парадигмой.</p> <p><bold>Результаты. </bold>Нежелательные эффекты зарегистрированы во время 9,9% сессий и в большинстве случаев имели слабую степень выраженности. Прекращение участия в исследовании зарегистрировано в 1 случае в связи с усилением боли в руке и ноге у пациента с центральным постинсультным болевым синдромом, которое, вероятно, не связано с биологическими эффектами стимуляции. В анализ включены данные 9 пациентов. После проведения tDCS выявлено статистически значимое увеличение общего показателя по шкале качества зрительного восприятия VFQ-25 (p = 0,02), а также улучшение по таким её разделам, как социальная активность (р = 0,02), психическое здоровье (р = 0,02), зависимость от окружающих (р = 0,04) и периферическое зрение (р = 0,04). Также отмечено статистически значимое улучшение психологического компонента качества жизни (р = 0,04), жизненной активности (р = 0,03), социального функционирования (р = 0,02), ролевого функционирования, обусловленного физическим состоянием (р = 0,04) и общего состояния здоровья (р = 0,008). В 3 случаях после tDCS выявлено увеличение активации затылочной коры по данным функциональной МРТ со зрительной парадигмой.</p> <p><bold>Заключение. </bold>tDCS является безопасным, хорошо переносимым и потенциально эффективным методом у пациентов с постинсультной гемианопсией. Для уточнения эффективности этого метода при гемианопсии необходимо проведение более крупных контролируемых рандомизированных исследований.</p> <p> </p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>stroke</kwd><kwd>hemianopia</kwd><kwd>non-invasive brain stimulation</kwd><kwd>transcranial direct current stimulation</kwd><kwd>functional MRI</kwd><kwd>quality of life</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>инсульт</kwd><kwd>гемианопсия</kwd><kwd>неинвазивная стимуляция мозга</kwd><kwd>транскраниальная электрическая стимуляция постоянным током</kwd><kwd>функциональная МРТ</kwd><kwd>качество жизни</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Rowe F., Brand D., Jackson C.A. et al. Visual impairment following stroke: do stroke patients require vision assessment? Ageing 2009; 38: 188–193. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afn230. PMID: 19029069.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Rowe F.J.; VIS writing Group. Vision In Stroke cohort: Profile overview of visual impairment. Brain Behav 2017; 7: e00771. DOI 10.1002/brb3.771. PMID: 29201538.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Pula J.H., Yuen C.A. Eyes and stroke: the visual aspects of cerebrovascular disease. Stroke Vasc Neurol 2017; 2: 210–220. DOI: 10.1136/svn-2017-000079. PMID: 29507782.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang X., Kedar S., Lynn M.J. et al. Homonymous hemianopia in stroke. J Neuroophthalmol 2006; 26: 180–183. DOI: 10.1097/01.wno.0000235587.41040.39. PMID: 16966935.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Gilhotra J.S., Mitchell P., Healey P.R. et al. Homonymous visual field defects and stroke in an older population. Stroke 2002; 33: 2417–2420. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000037647.10414.d2. PMID: 12364731.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Zhang X., Kedar S., Lynn M.J. et al. Homonymous hemianopias: clinical-anatomic correlations in 904 cases. Neurology 2006; 66: 906–910. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000203913.12088.93. PMID: 16567710.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Rowe F.J., Wright D., Brand D. et al. A prospective profile of visual field loss following stroke: prevalence, type, rehabilitation and outcome. Biomed Res Int 2013; 2013: 719096. DOI: 10.1155/2013/719096. PMID: 24089687.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Urbanski M., Coubard O.A., Bourlon C. Visualizing the blind brain: brainimaging of visual field defects from early recovery to rehabilitation techniques. Front Integr Neurosci 2014; 8: 74. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00074. PMID: 25324739.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Urbanski M., Coubard O.A., Bourlon C. Visualizing the blind brain: brain imaging of visual field defects from early recovery to rehabilitation techniques. Front Integr Neurosci 2014; 8: 74. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2014.00074. PMID: 25324739.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Gall C., Franke G.H., Sabel B.A. Vision-related quality of life in first stroke patients with homonymous visual field defects. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2010; 8: 33. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-33. PMID: 20346125.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Sand K.M., Wilhelmsen G., Naess H. et al. Vision problems in ischaemic stroke patients: effects on life quality and disability. Eur J Neurol 2016; 23 Suppl 1: 1–7. DOI: 10.1111/ene.12848. PMID: 26563092.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bowers A.R. Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature. Clin Exp Optom 2016; 99: 402–418. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12425. PMID: 27535208.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Bowers A.R. Driving with homonymous visual field loss: a review of the literature. ClinExpOptom 2016; 99: 402–418. DOI: 10.1111/cxo.12425. PMID: 27535208.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Gall C., Sabel B.A. Reading performance after vision rehabilitation of subjects with homonymous visual field defects. PM R 2012; 4: 928–935. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.08.020. PMID: 23122896.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Ramrattan R.S., Wolfs R.C., Panda-Jonas S. et al. Prevalence and causes of visual field loss in the elderly and associations with impairment in daily functioning: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1788–1794. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.119.12.1788. PMID: 11735788.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wolter M., Preda S. Visual deficits following stroke: maximizing participa-tion in rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006; 13: 12–21. DOI: 10.1310/3JRY-B168-5N49-XQWA. PMID: 16987788.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wolter M., Preda S. Visual deficits following stroke: maximizing participation in rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006; 13: 12–21. DOI: 10.1310/3JRY-B168-5N49-XQWA. PMID: 16987788.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sand K.M., Naess H., Thomassen L., Hoff J.M. Visual field defect afterischemic stroke-impact on mortality. Acta Neurol Scand 2018; 137: 293–298. DOI: 10.1111/ane.12870. PMID: 29148038.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sand K.M., Naess H., Thomassen L., Hoff J.M. Visual field defect after ischemic stroke-impact on mortality. Acta Neurol Scand 2018; 137: 293–298. DOI: 10.1111/ane.12870. PMID: 29148038.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Grunda T., Marsalek P., Sykorova P. Homonymous hemianopia and relatedvisual defects: Restoration of vision after a stroke. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)2013; 73: 237–49. PMID: 23823985.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Grunda T., Marsalek P., Sykorova P. Homonymous hemianopia and related visual defects: Restoration of vision after a stroke. Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars) 2013; 73: 237–49. PMID: 23823985.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Goodwin D. Homonymous hemianopia: challenges and solutions. Clin Oph-thalmol 2014; 8: 1919–1927. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S59452. PMID: 25284978.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Goodwin D. Homonymous hemianopia: challenges and solutions. Clin Ophthalmol 2014; 8: 1919–1927. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S59452. PMID: 25284978.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Frolov A., Feuerstein J., Subramanian P.S. Homonymous hemianopia and vision restoration therapy. Neurol Clin 2017; 35: 29–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2016.08.010. PMID: 27886894.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sabel B.A., Henrich-Noack P., Fedorov A., Gall C. Vision restoration af-ter brain and retina damage: the “residual vision activation theory”. Prog Brain Res 2011; 192: 199–262. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00013-0. PMID: 21763527.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sabel B.A., Henrich-Noack P., Fedorov A., Gall C. Vision restoration after brain and retina damage: the "residual vision activation theory". Prog Brain Res 2011; 192: 199–262. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00013-0. PMID: 21763527.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Gall C., Silvennoinen K., Granata G. et al. Non-invasive electric current stimulation for restoration of vision after unilateral occipital stroke. Contemp Clin Trials 2015; 43: 231–236. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.005. PMID: 26072125.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Priori A., Berardelli A., Rona S. et al. Polarization of the human motor cor-tex through the scalp. Neuroreport 1998; 9: 2257–2260. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199807130-00020. PMID: 9694210.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Priori A., Berardelli A., Rona S. et al. Polarization of the human motor cortex through the scalp. Neuroreport 1998; 9: 2257–2260. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199807130-00020. PMID: 9694210.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation. J Physiol 2000; 527(Pt 3): 633–639. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x. PMID: 10990547.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Yavari F., Jamil A., MosayebiSamani M. et al. Basic and functional effects of transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) — an introduction. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018; 85: 81–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.015. PMID: 28688701.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Cirillo G., Di Pino G., Capone F. et al. Neurobiological after-effects of non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimul 2017; 10: 1–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.11.009. PMID: 27931886.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lefaucheur J.P., Antal A., Ayache S.S. et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neuro-physiol 2017; 128: 56–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087. PMID: 27866120.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lefaucheur J.P., Antal A., Ayache S.S. et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128: 56–92. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087. PMID: 27866120.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bakulin I.S., Poydasheva A.G., Pavlov N.A. et al. [Transcranial current stimulation in poststroke hand paresis rehabilitation]. Uspekhi fiziologicheskih nauk2019; 50(1): 90–104. DOI: 10.1134/S030117981901003X. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бакулин И.С., Пойдашева А.Г., Павлов Н.А. и др. Транскраниальная электрическая стимуляция в улучшении функции руки при инсульте. Успехи физиологических наук 2019; 50(1): 90–104. DOI: 10.1134/S030117981901003X.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Salazar A.P.S., Vaz P.G., Marchese R.R. et al. Noninvasive brain stimulation improves hemispatial neglect after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2018; 99: 355–366.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.07.009. PMID: 28802812.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>Sebastian R., Tsapkini K., Tippett D.C. Transcranial direct current stimulation in post stroke aphasia and primary progressive aphasia: Current knowledge and future clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation 2016; 39: 141–152. DOI: 10.3233/NRE-161346. PMID: 27314871.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Plow E.B., Obretenova S.N., Fregni F. et al. Comparison of visual field training for hemianopia with active versus sham transcranial direct cortical stimulation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 26: 616–626. DOI: 10.1177/1545968311431963. PMID: 22291042.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Plow E.B., Obretenova S.N., Jackson M.L., Merabet L.B. Temporal pro-file of functional visual rehabilitative outcomes modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuromodulation 2012; 15: 367–373. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00440.x. PMID: 22376226.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Plow E.B., Obretenova S.N., Jackson M.L., Merabet L.B. Temporal profile of functional visual rehabilitative outcomes modulated by transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuromodulation 2012; 15: 367–373. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00440.x. PMID: 22376226.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Alber R., Moser H., Gall C. et al. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and vision restoration training in subacute stroke rehabilitation:a pilot study. PM R 2017; 9: 787–794. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.12.003. PMID: 28082176.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Alber R., Moser H., Gall C. et al. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and vision restoration training in subacute stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study. PM R 2017; 9: 787–794. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.12.003. PMID: 28082176.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Halko M.A., Datta A., Plow E.B. et al. Neuroplastic changes following reha-bilitative training correlate with regional electrical field induced with tDCS. Neuroimage 2011; 57: 885–891. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.026. PMID: 21620985.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Halko M.A., Datta A., Plow E.B. et al. Neuroplastic changes following rehabilitative training correlate with regional electrical field induced with tDCS. Neuroimage 2011; 57: 885–891. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.026. PMID: 21620985.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Plow E.B., Obretenova S.N., Halko M.A. et al. Combining visual rehabilitative training and noninvasive brain stimulation to enhance visual function in patients with hemianopia: a comparative case study. PM R 2011; 3: 825–835. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.05.026. PMID: 21944300.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Matteo B.M., Viganò B., Cerri C.G. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with blindsight rehabilitation for the treatment of homonymous hemianopia: a report of two-cases. J Phys Ther Sci 2017; 29: 1700–1705. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.1700. PMID: 28932016.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Larcombe S.J., Kulyomina Y., Antonova N. et al. Visual training in hemianopia alters neural activity in the absence of behavioural improvement: a pilot study. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2018; 38: 538–549. DOI: 10.1111/opo.12584. PMID: 30357899</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Mangione C.M., Lee P.P., Gutierrez P.R. et al. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119: 1050–1058. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050. PMID: 11448327.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mochalova A.S. [Quality of life in patients with different variants of melanoma of the chorioidea: med. sci. diss.]. Chelyabinsk, 2014. 128 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мочалова А.С. Качество жизни пациентов при различных вариантах лечения меланомы хориоидеи: дис. … канд. мед. наук. Челябинск, 2014. 128 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Novik A.A., Ionova T.I. [Guidance on the study of the quality of life in medicine]. Moscow: OLMA Media Group, 2007. 313 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Новик А.А., Ионова Т.И. Руководство по исследованию качества жизни в медицине. М.: ОЛМА Медиа Групп, 2007. 313 с.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Antal A., Alekseichuk I., Bikson M. et al. Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128: 1774–1809. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001. PMID: 28709880.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Antal A., Kincses T.Z., Nitsche M.A., Paulus W. Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man. Exp Brain Res 2003; 150: 375–378. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-003-1459-8. PMID: 12698316.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Antal A., Kincses T.Z., Nitsche M.A. et al. Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: di-rect electrophysiological evidence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 702–707. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0688. PMID: 14744917.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Antal A., Kincses T.Z., Nitsche M.A. et al. Excitability changes induced in the human primary visual cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation: direct electrophysiological evidence. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 702–707. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.03-0688. PMID: 14744917.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Kraft A., Roehmel J., Olma M.C. et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation affects visual perception measured by threshold perimetry. Exp Brain Res 2010; 207: 283–290. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2453-6. PMID: 21046369.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Costa T.L., Gualtieri M., Barboni M.T. et al. Contrasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on central and peripheral visual fields. Exp Brain Res 2015; 233: 1391–1397. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4213-0. PMID: 25650104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Behrens J.R., Kraft A., Irlbacher K. et al. Long-lasting enhancement of visual perception with repetitive noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation. Front Cell Neurosci 2017; 11: 238. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00238. PMID: 28860969.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Matteo B.M., Vigano B., Cerri C.G., Perin C. Visual field restorative rehabilitation after brain injury. J Vis 2016; 16: 11. DOI: 10.1167/16.9.11. PMID: 27472498.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Morland A.B., Le S., Carroll E. et al. The role of spared calcarine cortex and lateral occipital cortex in the responses of human hemianopes to visual motion.J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16: 204–218. DOI: 10.1162/089892904322984517. PMID: 15068592.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Morland A.B., Le S., Carroll E. et al. The role of spared calcarine cortex and lateral occipital cortex in the responses of human hemianopes to visual motion. J Cogn Neurosci 2004; 16: 204–218. DOI: 10.1162/089892904322984517. PMID: 15068592.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Chokron S., Perez C., Peyrin C. Behavioral consequences and cortical reorganization in homonymous hemianopia. Front Syst Neurosci 2016; 10: 57. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00057. PMID: 27445717.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Fendrich R., Wessinger C.M., Gazzaniga M.S. Speculations on the neural basis of islands of blindsight. Prog Brain Res 2001; 134: 353–366. DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(01)34023-2. PMID: 11702554.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Eysel U.T., Schweigart G. Increased receptive field size in the surround of chronic lesions in the adult cat visual cortex. Cereb Cortex 1999; 9: 101–109. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01153-9. PMID: 12531465.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Pleger B., Foerster A.F., Widdig W. et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging mirrors recovery of visual perception after repetitive tachistoscopic stimulation in patients with partial cortical blindness. Neurosci Lett 2003; 335: 192–196.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nelles G., Widman G., de Greiff A. et al. Brain representation of hemi-field stimulation in poststroke visual field defects. Stroke 2002; 33: 1286–1293. PMID: 11988605.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Nelles G., Widman G., de Greiff A. et al. Brain representation of hemifield stimulation in poststroke visual field defects. Stroke 2002; 33: 1286–1293. PMID: 11988605.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Nelles G., de Greiff A., Pscherer A. et al. Cortical activation in hemianopia after stroke. Neurosci Lett 2007; 426: 34–38. PMID: 17881128.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
