Cortical reorganization in multiple sclerosis

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Functional MRI (fMRI) is a new method promoting the study of brain functions and relationships between physiological activity and anatomical location. At present cortical reorganization is regarded as one of possible factors of recovery or maintenance of function in the presence of irreversible brain damage in multiple sclerosis (MS). Functional cortical changes have been demonstrated in all MS phenotypes using different fMRI paradigms, but the majority of studies were focused on the motor system. It was shown variability of functional reorganization of the motor cortex in MS depending on the stage of the disease. Cortical reorganization plays a role in limiting the impact of structural damage in MS; conversely, failure of these plastic mechanisms may cause irreversible disability upon the disease progression. Future dynamic fMRI studies will allow to access changes of functional brain activity in different disease severity and different extent of regress of MS symptoms. The improvement of cortical adaptive plasticity represents a potentially significant direction of rehabilitation in MS patients.

 

About the authors

I. A. Zavalishin

Research Center of Neurology

Email: krotenkova_mrt@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

A. V. Peresedova

Research Center of Neurology

Email: krotenkova_mrt@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

Marina V. Krotenkova

Research Center of Neurology

Author for correspondence.
Email: krotenkova_mrt@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3820-4554

D. Sci. (Med.), Head, Department of radiation diagnostics, Institute of Clinical and Preventive Neurology

Russian Federation, Moscow

O. V. Pugacheva

Research Center of Neurology

Email: krotenkova_mrt@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

Olga V. Trifonova

Research Center of Neurology

Email: krotenkova_mrt@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

References

  1. Aguirre G.K. Interpretation of clinical functional neuroimaging studies. In: Functional MRI: applications in clinical neurology and psychiatry (ed. M. D’Esposito). Informa Healthcare, 2006: 9–23.
  2. Binder J.R., Frost J.A., Hammeke T.A. et al. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb. Cortex. 2000; 10: 512–528.
  3. Binkofski F., Buccino G., Posse S. et al. A fronto-parietal circuit for object manipulation in man: evidence from an fMRI-study. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1999; 11: 3276–3286.
  4. Boussaoud D. Attention versus intention in the primate premotor cortex. Neuroimage 2001; 14: S40–S45.
  5. Cader S., Cifelli A., Abu-Omar Y. et al. Reduced brain functional reserve and altered functional connectivity in patients with multiple sclerosis. Brain 2006; 129: 527–537.
  6. Cavada C., Goldman-Rakic P.S. Posterior parietal cortex in rhesus monkey. II. Evidence for segregated corticocortical networks linking sensory and limbic areas with the frontal lobe. J. Comp. Neurol. 1989; 287: 422–445.
  7. Cohen Y.E., Andersen R.A. A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2002; 3: 553–562.
  8. Disbrow E., Roberts T., Krubitzer L. Somatotopic organization of cortical fields in the lateral sulcus of Homo sapiens: evidence for SII and PV. J. Comp. Neurol. 2000; 418: 1–21.
  9. Duong T.Q., Kim D.S., Ugurbil K. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the BOLD fMRI signals: toward mapping submillimeter cortical columns using the early negative response. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000; 44: 231–242.
  10. Filippi M., Bozzali M., Horsfield M.A. et al. A conventional and magnetization transfer MRI study of the cervical cord in patients with MS. Neurology 2000; 54: 207–213.
  11. Filippi M., Rocca M.A. Cortical reorganization in patients with MS. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2004; 75: 1087–1089.
  12. Filippi M., Rocca M.A. Disturbed function and plasticity in multiple sclerosis as gleaned from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2003; 16: 275–282.
  13. Filippi M., Rocca M.A. Magnetic resonance imaging techniques to define and monitor tissue damage and repair in multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. 2007; 254 (Suppl. 1): 55–62.
  14. Filippi M., Rocca M.A., Colombo B. et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging correlates of fatigue in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2002; 15: 559–567.
  15. Filippi M., Rocca M.A., Falini A. et al. Correlations between structural CNS damage and functional MRI changes in primary progressive MS. Neuroimage 2002; 15: 537–546.
  16. Filippi M., Rocca M.A., Mezzapesa D.M. et al. Simple and complex movement-associated functional MRI changes in patients at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2004; 21: 108–117.
  17. Grafton S.T., Mazziotta J.C., Woods R.P. et al. Human functional anatomy of visually guided finger movements. Brain 1992; 115: 565–587.
  18. Hamalainen H., Hitunen J., Titievskaja I. fMRI activations of SI and SII cortices during tactile stimulation depend on attention. Neuroreport 2000; 11: 1673–1676.
  19. Harrington D.L., Rao S.M., Haaland K.Y. et al. Specialized neural systems underlying representations of sequential movements. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000; 12: 56–77.
  20. Haslinger B., Erhard P., Weilke F. et al. The role of lateral premotor cerebellar-parietal circuits in motor sequence control: a parametric fMRI study. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain. Res. 2002; 13: 159–168.
  21. Hennig J., Speck O., Koch M.A. et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging: a review of methodological aspects and clinical applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2003; 18: 1–15.
  22. Jeannerod M., Frak V. Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1999; 9: 735–739.
  23. Karhu J., Tesche C.D. Simultaneous early processing of sensory input in human primary (SI) and secondary (SII) somatosensory cortices. J. Neurophysiol. 1999; 81: 2017–2025.
  24. Kidd D., Thorpe J.W., Kendall B.E. et al. MRI dynamics of brain and spinal cord in progressive multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1996; 60: 15–19.
  25. Kim S.G., Ashe J., Georgopoulos A.P. et al. Functional imaging of human motor cortex at high magnetic field. J. Neurophysiol. 1993; 69: 297–302.
  26. Kwong K.K., Belliveau J.W., Chesler D.A. et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992; 89: 5675–5679.
  27. Langkilde A.R., Frederiksen J.L., Rostrup E. et al. Functional MRI of the visual cortex and visual testing in patients with previous optic neuritis. Eur. J. Neurol. 2002; 9: 277–286.
  28. Lee M., Reddy H., Johansen-Berg H. et al. The motor cortex shows adaptive functional changes to brain injury from multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 2000; 47: 606–613.
  29. Leuthold H., Jentzsch I. Distinguishing neural sources of movement preparation and execution. An electrophysiological analysis. Biol. Psychol. 2002; 60: 173–198.
  30. Malonek D., Grinvald A. Interactions between electrical activity and cortical microcirculation revealed by imaging spectroscopy: implications for functional brain mapping. Science 1996; 272: 551–554.
  31. Martino A.M., Strick P.L. Corticospinal projections originate from the arcuate premotor area. Brain Res. 1987; 404: 307–312.
  32. Milak M.S., Shimansky Y., Bracha V. et al. Effects of inactivating individual cerebellar nuclei on the performance and retention of an operantly conditioned forelimb movement. J. Neurophysiol. 1997; 78: 939–959.
  33. Moore C.J., Price C.J. Three distinct ventral occipitotemporal regions for reading and object naming. Neuroimage 1999; 10: 181–192.
  34. Nijeholt G.J., van Walderveen M.A., Castelijns J.A. et al. Brain and spinal cord abnormalities in multiple sclerosis. Correlation between MRI parameters, clinical subtypes and symptoms. Brain 1998; 121: 687–697.
  35. Ogawa S., Lee T.M. Magnetic resonance imaging of blood vessels at high fields: in vivo and in vitro measurements and image simulation. Magn. Reson. Med. 1990; 16: 9–18.
  36. Pantano P., Mainero C., Iannetti G.D. et al. Contribution of corticospinal tract damage to cortical motor reorganization after a single clinical attack of multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 1837–1843.
  37. Pantano P., Iannetti G.D., Caramia F. et al. Cortical motor reorganization after a single clinical attack of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2002; 125: 1607–1615.
  38. Paus T., Petrides M., Evans A.C., Meyer E. Role of the human anterior cingulated cortex in the control of oculomotor, manual, and speech responses: a positron emission tomography study. J. Neurophysiol. 1993; 70: 453–469.
  39. Price R.R., Allison J., Massoth R.J. et al. Practical aspects of functional MRI (NMR Task Group #8). Med. Phys. 2002; 29: 1892–1912.
  40. Raineteau О., Schwab M.E. Plasticity of motor systems after incomplete spinal cord injury. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2001; 2: 263–273.
  41. Rao S.M., Binder J.R., Bandettini P.A. et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of complex human movements. Neurology 1993; 43: 2311–2318.
  42. Reddy H., Narayanan S., Arnoutelis R. et al. Evidence for adaptive functional changes in the cerebral cortex with axonal injury from multiple sclerosis. Brain 2000; 123: 2314–2320.
  43. Reddy H., Narayanan S., Matthews P.M. et al. Relating axonal injury to functional recovery in MS. Neurology 2000; 54: 236–239.
  44. Revesz T., Kidd D., Thompson A.J. et al. A comparison of the pathology of primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 1994; 117: 759–765.
  45. Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L., Gallese V. Parietal cortex: from sight to action. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1997; 7: 562–567.
  46. Rocca M., Falini A., Colombo B. et al. Adaptive functional changes in the cerebral cortex of patients with nondisabiling multiple sclerosis correlate with the extent of brain structural damage. Ann. Neurol. 2002; 51: 330–339.
  47. Rocca M.A., Colombo B., Falini A. et al. Cortical adaptation in patients with MS: a cross-sectional functional MRI study of disease phenotypes. Lancet Neurol. 2005; 4: 618–626.
  48. Rocca M.A., Gavazzi C., Mezzapesa D.M. et al. A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 1770–1777.
  49. Rocca M.A., Matthews P.M., Caputo D. et al. Evidence for wide-spread movement-associated functional MRI changes in patients with PPMS. Neurology 2002; 58: 866–872.
  50. Rocca M.A., Mezzapesa D.M., Falini A. et al. Evidence for axonal pathology and adaptive cortical reorganization in patients at presentation with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2003; 18: 847–855.
  51. Rombouts S.A., Lazeron R.H., Scheltens P. et al. Visual activation patterns in patients with optic neuritis: an fMRI pilot study. Neurology 1998; 50: 1896–1899.
  52. Schlaug G., Knorr U., Seitz R. Inter-subject variability of cerebral activations in acquiring a motor skill: a study with positron emission tomography. Exp. Brain Res. 1994; 98: 523–534.
  53. Shapleske J., Rossell S.L., Woodruff P.W. et al. The planum temporale: a systematic, quantitative review of its structural, functional and clinical significance. Brain Res. Rev. 1999; 29: 26–49.
  54. Stepan K.M., Fink G.R., Passingham R.E. et al. Functional anatomy of the mental representation of upper extremity movements in healthy subjects. J. Neurophysiol. 1995; 73: 373–386.
  55. Thompson A.J., Kermode A.J., Wicks D. et al. Major differences in the dynamics of primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 1991; 29: 53–62.
  56. Tracey I., Hamberg L.M., Guimaraes A.R. et al. Increased cerebral blood volume in HIV-positive patients detected by functional MRI. Neurology 1998; 50: 1821–1826.
  57. Van Mier H., Tempel L.W., Perlmutter J.S. et al. Changes in brain activity during motor learning measured with PET: effects of hand of performance and practice. J. Neurophysiol. 1998; 80: 2177–2199.
  58. Werring D.J., Bullmore E.T., Toosy A.T. et al. Recovery from optic neuritis is associated with a change in the distribution of cerebral response to visual stimulation: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2000; 68: 441–449.
  59. Wishart H.A., Saykin A.J., McDonald B.C. et al. Brain activation patterns associated with working memory in relapsing-remitting MS. Neurology 2004; 62: 234–238.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2008 Zavalishin I.A., Peresedova A.V., Krotenkova M.V., Pugacheva O.V., Trifonova O.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-83204 от 12.05.2022.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies