Mechanisms of neuroplastisity and rehabilitation in hyperacute period of stroke

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Main mechanisms of neuroplastisity obtained in hyperacute period of stroke are described in this review. Neurons regeneration process condition are discussed. Necessity of early rehabilitation and revision of stroke patients management asserted according to novel experimental and clinical data.

 

About the authors

I. V. Sidyakina

Federal Budget State Institution «Medical and Rehabilitation Center» Ministry of Public Health Russian Federation

Author for correspondence.
Email: sidneuro@mail.ru
Россия, Moscow

T. V. Schapovalenko

Federal Budget State Institution «Medical and Rehabilitation Center» Ministry of Public Health Russian Federation

Email: sidneuro@mail.ru
Россия, Moscow

K. V. Lyadov

Federal Budget State Institution «Medical and Rehabilitation Center» Ministry of Public Health Russian Federation

Email: sidneuro@mail.ru
Россия, Moscow

References

  1. Ancheta J., Husband M., Law D., Reding M. Initial functional independence measure score and interval post stroke help assess outcome, length of hospitalization, and quality of care. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 2000 Jan; 14 (2): 127–134.
  2. Arvidsson A., Collin T., Kirik D et al. Neuronal replacement from endogenous precursors in the adult brain after stroke. Nature medicine. 2002 Sep; 8 (9): 963–970.
  3. Bernhardt J., Dewey H., Thrift A. et al. A very early rehabilitation trial for stroke (AVERT): phase II safety and feasibility. Stroke. 2008 Feb; 39 (2): 390–396.
  4. Bernhardt J., Dewey H., Thrift A., Donnan G. Inactive and alone: physical activity within the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke. 2004 Apr; 35 (4): 1005–1009.
  5. Biernaskie J., Corbett D. Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. The Journal of neuroscience. 2001 Jul 15; 21 (14): 5272–5280.
  6. Carmichael S.T. Plasticity of cortical projections after stroke. The Neuroscientist. 2003 Feb; 9 (1): 64–75.
  7. Chen R., Cohen L.G., Hallett M. Nervous system reorganization following injury. Neuroscience. 2002 Jan; 111 (4): 761–773.
  8. Cifu D.X., Stewart D.G. Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1999 May; 80 (5 Suppl 1): S35–9.
  9. Cumming T.B., Collier J., Thrift A.G., Bernhardt J. The effect of very early mobilisation after stroke on psychological well-being. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2008 Aug; 40 (8): 609–614.
  10. Cumming T.B., Thrift A.G., Collier J.M. et al. Very early mobilization after stroke fast-tracks return to walking: further results from the phase II AVERT randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2011 Jan; 42 (1): 153–158.
  11. Eriksson P.S., Perfilieva E., Björk-Eriksson T. et al. Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nature medicine. 1998 Nov; 4 (11):1313–1317.
  12. Feeney D.M., Hovda D.A. Reinstatement of binocular depth perception by amphetamine and visual experience after visual cortex ablation. Brain research. 1985 Sep 9; 342 (2): 352–356.
  13. Grotta J.C., Noser E.A., Ro T. et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2004 Nov; 35 (11 Suppl 1): 2699–2701.
  14. Jin K., Minami M., Lan J.Q. et al. Neurogenesis in dentate subgranular zone and rostral subventricular zone after focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001 Apr 10; 98 (8): 4710–4715.
  15. Jin K., Wang X., Xie L. et al. Evidence for stroke-induced neurogenesis in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2006 Aug 29; 103 (35):13198–13202.
  16. Johansen-Berg H., Dawes H., Guy C. et al. Correlation between motor improvements and altered fMRI activity after rehabilitative therapy. Brain. 2002 Dec; 125 (Pt 12): 2731–2742.
  17. Johansson B.B. Brain plasticity and stroke rehabilitation. The Willis lecture. Stroke. 2000 Jan; 31 (1): 223–230.
  18. Jшrgensen H.S., Nakayama H., Raaschou H.O. et al. Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: Outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1995 May; 76 (5): 399–405.
  19. Macas J., Nern C., Plate K.H., Momma S. Increased generation of neuronal progenitors after ischemic injury in the aged adult human forebrain. The Journal of neuroscience. 2006 Dec 13; 26 (50):13114–13119.
  20. Maulden S.A., Gassaway J., Horn S.D. et al. Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2005 Dec; 86 (12 Suppl 2): S34–S40.
  21. Minger S.L., Ekonomou A., Carta E.M. et al. Endogenous neurogenesis in the human brain following cerebral infarction. Regenerative medicine. 2007 Jan; 2 (1): 69–74.
  22. Netz J., Lammers T., Hцmberg V. Reorganization of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. Brain. 1997 Sep; 120 (Pt 9):1579–1586.
  23. Nudo R.J., Milliken G.W. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. Journal of neurophysiology. 1996 May; 75 (5):2144–2149.
  24. Nudo R.J., Wise B.M., SiFuentes F., Milliken G.W. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science (New York, N.Y.). 1996 Jun 21; 272 (5269):1791–1794.
  25. Paolucci S., Antonucci G., Grasso M.G. et al. Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a matched comparison conducted in Italy. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2000 Jun; 81 (6):695–700.
  26. Parent J.M., Vexler Z.S., Gong C. et al. Rat forebrain neurogenesis and striatal neuron replacement after focal stroke. Annals of neurology. 2002 Dec; 52 (6): 802–813.
  27. Risedal A., Mattsson B., Dahlqvist P. et al. Environmental influences on functional outcome after a cortical infarct in the rat. Brain research bulletin. 2002 Jul; 58 (3): 315–321.
  28. Rusk H.A. A World to Care For: The Autobiography of Howard A. Rusk, M.D. New York: Random House; 1972.
  29. Salter K., Jutai J., Hartley M. et al. Impact of early vs delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. Journal of rehabilitation medicine. 2006 Mar; 38 (2): 113–117.
  30. Shah S., Vanclay F., Cooper B. Predicting discharge status at commencement of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1989 Jun; 20 (6): 766–769.
  31. Thored P., Arvidsson A., Cacci E. et al. Persistent production of neurons from adult brain stem cells during recovery after stroke. Stem cells. 2006 Mar; 24 (3): 739–747.
  32. Turton A., Wroe S., Trepte N. et al. Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. 1996 Aug; 101 (4): 316–328.
  33. Weiller C., Rijntjes M. Learning, plasticity, and recovery in the central nervous system. Experimental brain research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation cérébrale. 1999 Sep; 128 (1–2):134–138.
  34. Zhang Z.G., Chopp M. Neurorestorative therapies for stroke: underlying mechanisms and translation to the clinic. Lancet neurology. 2009 May; 8 (5): 491–500.
  35. Zhang R.L., Zhang Z.G., Zhang L., Chopp M. Proliferation and differentiation of progenitor cells in the cortex and the subventricular zone in the adult rat after focal cerebral ischemia. Neuroscience. 2001 Jan; 105 (1): 33–41.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2013 Sidyakina I.V., Schapovalenko T.V., Lyadov K.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-83204 от 12.05.2022.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies