Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: 10 years of treatment experience

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text


Introduction. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) results from prolonged cervical stenosis and is characterized by severe neurological disturbances. Given the high degree of disability and the ineffectiveness of conservative treatment for CSM, spinal decompression surgery is preferable. Two surgical treatment approaches are currently in competition — laminoplasty and corpectomy.

The study aimed to analyze the early (1 day after surgery) and long-term (12, 60, and 120 months after surgery) clinical, radiological, and neuroimaging results of CSM surgery.

Materials and methods. Two hundred and twenty-six patients (91 women and 135 men, average age 48.1 years) with degenerative cervical spinal stenosis accompanied by myelopathy underwent surgery. Pain severity (VAS score), proprioception (M. Doita’s scale), ability to perform self-care (Nurick scale), and recovery after surgery (JOA scale) were clinically evaluated. The stability of the cervical spine was evaluated radiologically. Stenosis severity and myelopathy lesions were assessed based on the neuroimaging data.

Results. Early and long-term clinical, radiological, and neuroimaging results were evaluated. Neck pain was 0–3 points on the VAS in the long-term (12, 60, and 120 months after surgery), decreasing from the initial 6–8 points. The JOA scale results showed that the efficacy of myelopathy treatment directly depended on disease history and the timing of surgical intervention. According to the Nurick scale, there was a tendency towards significant improvement in neurological status in patients with moderate disease. In contrast, the neurological status improved or remained stable in patients with the more pronounced disease, but this required more time. Improvement in proprioception as measured by the M. Doita scale was observed in patients at all stages of the disease.

Conclusion. Both surgical methods (laminoplasty and corpectomy) lead to good outcomes in CSM treatment. The effectiveness of surgical treatment for CSM directly depends on the disease duration and timing of the decompression surgery. Recovery is better when clinical symptoms of CSM are mild, moderate, and moderately severe and with a timely presentation to a surgeon.

About the authors

Artyom O. Gushcha

Research Center of Neurology

Email: drevalmax@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

Maxim D. Dreval

Russian Medical Academy of Continuing Postgraduate Education

Author for correspondence.
Email: drevalmax@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

Adilya R. Yusupova

Research Center of Neurology

Email: drevalmax@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

Sergey O. Arestov

Research Center of Neurology

Email: drevalmax@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

David V. Petrosyan

Research Center of Neurology

Email: drevalmax@mail.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow


  1. [Degenerative spine surgery: national guidelines] Eds. A.O. Gushcha, N.A. Konovalov, A.A. Grin’. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2019. 480 p. (In Russ.)
  2. Gushcha A.O., Korepina O.S., Dreval’ M.D., Kireeva N.S. A case study of multilevel cervical myelopathy caused by degenerative compression. Nervnye bolezni. 2013; 3: 39–43. (In Russ.)
  3. Matz P.G., Anderson P.A., Holly L.T. et al. The natural history of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009; 11(2): 104–111. doi: 10.3171/2009.1.SPINE08716. PMID: 19769489.
  4. Tracy J.A., Bartleson B.J. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist. 2010; 16(3): 176–187. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181da3a29. PMID: 20445427.
  5. Kovalova I., Kerkovsky M., Kadanka Z. et al. Prevalence and imaging characteristics of non-myelopathic and myelopathic spondylotic cervical cord compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(24): 1908–1916. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001842. PMID: 27509189
  6. Nouri A., Tetreault L., Singh A. et al. Degenerative cervical myelopathy: epidemiology, genetics, and pathogenesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015; 40: E675–E693. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000913. PMID: 25839387.
  7. Boogaarts H.D., Bartels R.H.M.A. Prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2015; 24(Suppl 2): 139–141. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2781-x. PMID: 23616201.
  8. Gushcha A.O., Dreval’ M.D., Arestov S.O. et al. Laminoplasty and corporectomy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy treatment. Annals of clinical and experimental neurology. 2017; 11(4): 36–44. doi: 10.18454/ACEN.2017.4.4 (In Russ.)
  9. Heller J.G., Edwards C.C., Murakami H. et al. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched cohort analysis. Spine. 2001; 26(12): 1330–1336. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200106150-00013. PMID: 11426147.
  10. Hirabayashi K., Satomi K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine. 1988; 13(7): 870–876. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198807000-00032. PMID: 3143157.
  11. Kadoya S., Nakamura T., Kwar R. A microsurgical anterior osteophytectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 1984; 9(5): 437–443. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198407000-00001. PMID: 6495007.
  12. Antipko L.E. [Spinal stenosis]. Voronezh, 2001. 271 p. (In Russ.)
  13. Shevelev I.N., Gushcha A.O. [Degenerative cervical spine disorders: guidelines]. Moscow, 2008: 65–87. (In Russ.)
  14. Clarke E., Robinson P.K. Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1956; 79(3): 483–510. doi: 10.1093/brain/79.3.483. PMID: 13364095.
  15. Wiberg J. Effects of surgery on cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1986; 81(3–4): 113–117. doi: 10.1007/BF01401231. PMID: 3529837.
  16. Dreval’ M.D., Gushcha A.O. Laminoplasty in surgical treatment of cervical spondylogenic myelopathy: review. Hirurgiya pozvonochnika. 2015; 12(2): 44–50. (In Russ.)
  17. Gushcha A.O., Dreval’ M.D., Poltorako E.N., Arestov S.O. Decompressive surgery treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Systematic analysis and management of biomedical systems. 2017; 16(4): 781–791. (In Russ.)
  18. Gushcha A.O., Dreval’ M.D., Petrosyan D.V. et al. Cervical arthroplasty: 5-year observation. Annals of clinical and experimental neurology. 2019; 13(1): 26–30. doi: 10.25692/ACEN.2019.1.3. (In Russ.)
  19. Belova A.N. [Scales, tests and questionnaires in neurology and neurosurgery]. Moscow, 2004. 432 p. (In Russ.)
  20. Doita M., Sakai H., Harada T. et al. The influence of proprioceptive impairment on hand function in patients with cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(14):1580–1584. doi: 10.1097/01. brs.0000222034.78210.43. PMID: 16778692.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files

Copyright (c) 2021 Gushcha A.O., Dreval M.D., Yusupova A.R., Arestov S.O., Petrosyan D.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-83204 от 12.05.2022.

This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies