Carotid artery stenting: early and long-term results

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

We studied 147 patients who underwent 171 interventions of transluminal balloon angioplasty with carotid artery stenting (CAS). Mean degree of stenosis measured by angiography before the intervention was 74±10%. Technical success (residual stenosis <30%) was achieved in 97% cases. Acute stroke during the intervention and in the early postoperative period was registered in 17 (11.6%) subjects: 11 (7.5%) patients had TIAs, 3 (2.05%) had “minor” stroke and 3 (2.05%) had “major” stroke. No events of myocardial infarction or death were observed. One hundred thirty-three patients (90%) were followed-up in the long-term perspective (21 [13; 38] months). Ipsilateral stroke was diagnosed in one patient (0.8%). No events of restenosis (≥50%) were observed in 155 cases of CAS. Asymptomatic stent occlusion was recorded 11 months after intervention in one patient (0.6%) who had subtotal stenosis of ipsilateral intracranial internal carotid artery. Thus, acute neurological deterioration develops mainly in the perioperative period, but the rate of stroke is low (4.1%). CAS is an effective method to prevent stroke in the long-term perspective in patients with extracranial carotid stenosis.

 
 

About the authors

Andrey O. Chechetkin

Research Center of Neurology

Email: andreychechetkin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8726-8928

D. Sci. (Med.), Head, Ultrasound diagnostic laboratory

Россия, Moscow

G. I. Kunzevich

Research Center of Neurology

Email: andreychechetkin@gmail.com
Россия, Moscow

Sergey I. Skrylev

Research Center of Neurology

Email: andreychechetkin@gmail.com
Россия, Moscow

Aleksandr Yu. Koshcheev

Research Center of Neurology

Email: andreychechetkin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0160-7499

Cand. Sci. (Med.), cardiovascular surgeon, Group of vascular and endovascular surgery

Россия, 125367 Moscow, Volokolamskoye shosse, 80

S. V. Prozky

Research Center of Neurology

Email: andreychechetkin@gmail.com
Россия, Moscow

Olga V. Lagoda

Research Center of Neurology

Author for correspondence.
Email: andreychechetkin@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7562-4991

Cand. Sci. (Med.), senior researcher, 1st Neurological department, Institute of Clinical and Preventive Neurology

Россия, Moscow

Alexey V. Krasnikov

Research Center of Neurology

Email: andreychechetkin@gmail.com
Россия, Moscow

Z. A. Suslina

Research Centre of Neurology

Email: andreychechetkin@gmail.com
Россия, Moscow

References

  1. Кавтеладзе З.А., Былов К.В., Дроздов С.А. и др. Эндоваскулярные методы лечения атеросклеротических поражений сонных артерий. Consilium Medicum 2009; 11: 17–26.
  2. Свистов Д.В., Кандыба Д.В., Савелло А.В. и др. Внутрисосудистые методы профилактики ишемического инсульта: ангиопластика со стентированием сонных артерий при атеросклеротическом стенозе. Consilium Medicum (приложение «Неврология») 2008; 1: 41–46.
  3. Al-Mubarak N., Roubin G., Vitek J. et al. Effect of the distal-balloon protection system on microembolization during carotid stenting. Circulation 2001; 104: 1999–2002.
  4. Bergeron P., Roux M., Khanoyan P. et al. Long-term results of carotid stenting are competitive with surgery. J. Vasc. Surg. 2005; 41: 213–221.
  5. Biasi G., Froio A., Diethrich E. et al. Carotid plaque echolucency increases the risk of stroke in carotid stenting: the Imaging in Carotid Angioplasty and Risk of Stroke (ICAROS) study. Circulation 2004; 110: 756–762.
  6. Brooks W., McClure R., Jones M. et al. Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: randomized trial in a community hospital. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2001; 38: 1589–1595.
  7. Brooks W., McClure R., Jones M. et al. Carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy for treatment of asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a randomized trial in a community hospital. Neurosurgery 2004; 54: 318–324.
  8. Brott T., Hobson R., Howard G. et al. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010; 363: 11–23.
  9. Coutts S., Hill M., Hu W. Hyperperfusion syndrome: toward a stricter definition. Neurosurgery 2003; 53: 1053–1058.
  10. de Donato G., Setacci C., Deloose K. et al. Long-term results of carotid artery stenting. J. Vasc. Surg. 2008; 48: 1431–1440.
  11. Eckstein H., Ringleb P., Allenberg J. et al. Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7: 893–902.
  12. Ederle J., Featherstone R., Brown M. Randomized controlled trials comparing endarterectomy and endovascular treatment for carotid artery stenosis: a Cochrane systematic review. Stroke 2009; 40: 1373–1380.
  13. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995; 273: 1421–1428.
  14. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet 1998; 351: 1379–1387.
  15. Goodney P., Powell R. Carotid artery stenting: what have we learned from the clinical trials and registries and where do we go from here? Ann. Vasc. Surg. 2008; 22: 148–158.
  16. Gröschel K., Riecker A., Schulz J. et al. Systematic review of early recurrent stenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 2005; 36: 367–373.
  17. Gupta R., Horowitz M., Jovin T. Hemodynamic instability after carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement: a review of the literature. Neurosurg. Focus 2005; 18: e6.
  18. Halliday A., Mansfield A., Marro J. et al. MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1491–1502.
  19. Hoffmann A., Engelter S., Taschner C. et al. Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy – a prospective randomised controlled single-centretrial with long-term follow-up (BACASS). Schweiz Arch. Neurol. Psychiatr. 2008; 159: 84–89.
  20. Kwon B., Han M., Kang H. et al. Protection filter-related events in extracranial carotid artery stenting: a single-center experience. J. Endovasc. Ther. 2006; 13: 711–722.
  21. Lal B. Recurrent carotid stenosis after CEA and CAS: diagnosis and management. Semin. Vasc. Surg. 2007; 20: 259–266.
  22. Lin P., Zhou W., Kougias P. et al. Factors associated with hypotension and bradycardia after carotid angioplasty and stenting. J. Vasc. Surg. 2007; 46: 846–853.
  23. McCabe D., Brown M., Clifton A. Fatal cerebral reperfusion hemorrhage after carotid stenting. Stroke 1999; 30: 2483–2486.
  24. Meyers P., Higashida R., Phatouros C. et al. Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome after percutaneous transluminal stenting of the craniocervical arteries. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 335–343.
  25. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaborative Group. The final results of the NASCET trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998; 339: 1415–1425.
  26. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke 1991; 22: 711–720.
  27. Roubin G., New G., Iyer S. et al. Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation 2001; 103: 532–537.
  28. White C. Carotid artery stent placement. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2010; 3: 467–474.
  29. Wholey M., Al-Mubarek N. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc. Interv. 2003; 60: 259–266.
  30. Wholey M., Tan W., Toursarkissian B. et al. Management of neurological complications of carotid artery stenting. J. Endovasc. Ther. 2001; 8: 341–353.
  31. Yadav J., Wholey M., Kuntz R. et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004; 351: 1493–1501.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2011 Chechetkin A.O., Kunzevich G.I., Skrylev S.I., Koshcheev A.Y., Prozky S.V., Lagoda O.V., Krasnikov A.V., Suslina Z.A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-83204 от 12.05.2022.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies