Neuroplasticity, music, and human brain

Cover Page


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Introduction. Studying the influence of music on the human brain is one of the key topics in neuroscience as it allows extending our understanding of brain neuroplasticity.

This study aimed to investigate structural brain organization in professional musicians.

Materials and methods. We investigated 27 brains (i.e. 54 hemispheres) of male musicians, female musicians, male non-musicians, and female non-musicians by magnetic resonance imaging. All study participants were aged 20 to 30 years and did not have any mental or neurological disorders. Gray matter volume and cortex thickness in different cortical structures of the right and left hemispheres were measured.

Results. We found major changes in the brain structure in professional musicians (both male and female) vs. non-musicians. We found differences in the macroscopic structure of the triangular region in the Broca’s motor speech area in musicians’ brain. Increases in gray matter volume in the brain of musicians and its individual cortical structures were shown in the superior temporal region, Broca’s motor speech area, hippocampus, superior parietal lobule, and other structures. We found increased thickness of cortical structures in musicians vs. non-musicians.

Conclusions. Practicing music regularly was shown to change structural brain organization; we found significant increases in gray matter volume and cortex thickness in various cortical structures in the right and left brain hemispheres of musicians vs. non-musicians.

Full Text

Introduction

Neuroplasticity or brain plasticity is one of the key topics in neuroscience. The term neuroplasticity refers to the ability of the brain to change its function and structure under the influence of external environment, professional activity, or psychological stress [1–5].

Santiago Ramón y Cajal was one of the first researchers to use the term neural plasticity; however, he used it to describe the neuron as a key and fundamental brain unit. Afterwards, this term was used mainly to describe rege- neration of peripheral nervous system [6].

The use of microelectrodes in neurophysiological stu-dies allowed researchers to record electrical signals from neurons and, therefore, to elucidate interactions between individual neurons by drawing structural and functional maps of the brain. In the 1960s, D. Hubel and T. Wiesel studied animals’ brain and showed that the brain had greater plasticity in younger animals, especially between Week 3 and Week 8 of the postnatal period. By showing changes in the functioning of cortical brain structures in animals with visual impairment, these authors also demonstrated for the first time that the functional map of the brain can change [7–9].

Further experimental studies showed the ability of structural and functional brain maps to change [10–12].

Studies to evaluate the brain of healthy human subjects and patients by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) greatly contributed to understanding neuroplasticity. For the first time, changes in people’s brain related to their professional activity were shown.

Music is an essential component of human emotional life. Many modern publications clearly demonstrated that music influenced human memory, rhythm, and perception of time. Listening to music, people can calm down and relax, or music can make them move or dance. Practicing music professionally can reshape a person’s life [13, 14]; however, there are very few studies, if any, to evaluate musicians’ brains.

This study aimed to investigate structural brain organization in professional musicians.

Materials and methods

A total of 27 brains (i.e. 54 hemispheres) of 9 male non-musicians, 9 female non-musicians, 5 male musicians, and 4 female musicians were studied by MRI. All study subjects were aged 20 to 30 years and did not have any mental or neurological disorders. All male and female musicians have been playing the piano since their childhood and had a university degree in music (i.e. piano). Currently they worked as piano teachers, accompanists or gave recitals.

Study subjects provided informed consent to participate in the study. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Research Center of Neurology (Protocol 7-4/22, August 29, 2022).

We measured total volume of the gray matter, white matter, several cortical structures, inferior frontal gyrus, opercular region of Broca’s motor speech area, parahippocampal gyrus, superior temporal gyrus, temporal pole, and other brain structures, as well as cortex thickness in several brain regions.

The study was performed using an ultra-high-field Siemens MAGNETOM Prisma MRI scanner in T1 MP2RAGE sequence in the sagittal plane with 176 slices, slice thickness of 1 mm, scanning parameters TR = 5000.0 ms, ТЕ = 2.74 ms, TI1 = 700 ms, TI2 = 2500 ms, flip angle1 = 4°, flip angle2 = 5° and matrix size of 256 mm. Brain surface was reconstructed by processing MRI images using CAT12 MRI data processing toolkit, which was created using Matlab package. The Segment module was used according to the standard procedure described in the CAT12 application manual. Gray matter volume and cortex thickness were measured using CAT12 in the ROI Tools module with neuromorphometrics and parc_a2009s_thickness atlases.

Data were processed statistically using Statistica v. 8 and Rver.4.x software packages. Differences between brain parameters of musicians and non-musicians were assessed for significance using non-parametric statistics with Mann – Whitney U-test. Differences were consi- dered significant if the level of statistical significance p was less than 0.05. For the ease of data representation in the article, median values (M) and interquartile ranges (Q1–Q3) were provided.

Results

We found major changes in the brain structure of male musicians vs. male non-musicians and female musicians vs. female non-musicians. An analysis to compare the macroscopic structure of the Broca’s area in the left hemisphere (LH) showed that female musicians had more complex structure of the triangular region in the brain cortex compared with female non-musicians. Additional grooves were seen in the brain of female musicians compared with female non-musicians (especially in the triangular region), as well as merging of the triangular region with the opercular region and the orbital region of the brain due to the presence of interstitial formations, which increased the size of both the triangular and opercular regions (Fig. 1, 2).

 

Fig. 1. Structure of Broca’s area in the brain of a female musician, LH. Triangular region is shown in green; opercular region is shown in blue.

 

Fig. 2. Structure of Broca’s area in the brain of a female non-musician, LH. Triangular region is shown in green; opercular region is shown in blue.

 

In male musicians, relative volume of the gray matter as a percentage of total brain volume was greater than in male non-musicians (р = 0.048): median relative volume of the gray matter as a percentage of total brain volume was 36.00% ± 4.05% in male non-musicians and 40.25% ± 3.68% in male non-musicians. In women, differences were not considered significant (p = 0.44; Fig. 3).

 

Fig. 3. Relative volume of gray matter in male and female non-musicians and musicians, % of total brain volume.

 

This study showed that the volume of several cortical structures in the brain of male and female musicians was bigger than that of male and female non-musicians, respectively. Median volume of the opercular region of Broca’s motor speech area in the inferior frontal gyrus of the right hemisphere (RH) was 2.53 ± 0.94 cm³ and 2.82 ± 0.10 cm³ in male non-musicians and male musicians, respectively. Male musicians had the same trend in their brain LH. Median volume of the opercular region of Broca’s motor speech area in the LH was 2.42 ± 0.62 cm³ and 2.72 ± 0.09 cm³ in male non-musicians and male musicians, respectively.

Hippocampus volume was slightly increased in musicians (p = 0.57), and median hippocampus volume in the RH was 3.25 ± 0.19 cm³ and 3.32 ± 0.36 cm³ in male non-musicians and male musicians, respectively.

Of note are changes in the volume of cortical structures in the temporal region of the brain in male musicians compared with these brain structures in non-musicians (Fig. 4). Median volume of the superior temporal gyrus in the RH was 5.27 ± 0.88 cm³ and 6.34 ± 0.72 cm³ in male non-musicians and male musicians, respectively (p = 0.048). Median volume of the superior temporal gyrus in the LH in male musicians (5.95 ± 0.45 cm³) was also higher than in male non-musicians (5.53 ± 0.73 cm³) (p = 0.110). In women, median volume of the superior temporal gyrus in the RH was 5.63 ± 0.38 cm³ and 5.46 ± 0.62 cm³ in female musicians and female non-musicians, respectively (р = 0.604). Median volume of the superior temporal gyrus in the LH was 5.10 ± 0.77 cm3 and 5.32 ± 0.51 cm3, respectively (р = 0.604).

 

Fig. 4. Volume of superior temporal gyrus in musicians and non-musicians, cm3.

 

A trend towards an increased volume of the superior parietal lobe was shown in musicians (Fig. 5). Median volume of the superior parietal lobe in the RH was 6.58 ± 1.33 cm³ in male non-musicians and 7.58 ± 2.20 cm³ in male musicians (р = 0.072); that in the LH was 7.21 ± 1.40 cm³ and 7.89 ± 1.61 cm³, respectively (р = 0.368). In women, median volume of the superior parietal lobe in the RH was 6.40 ± 1.19 cm³ and 7.71 ± 1.19 cm³ in female non-musicians and female musicians, respectively (р = 0.076). In the LH, median volume of the superior parietal lobe was 7.14 ± 1.16 cm³ and 8.04 ± 1.18 cm³ in female non-musicians and female musicians, respectively (р = 0.330).

 

Fig. 5. The volume of the upper parietal lobule of the brain of musicians and people of the control group, cm3.

 

This study demonstrated increased thickness of the cortex in several cortical structures in musicians. For example, median cortex thickness in the angular gyrus of the brain LH was 2.04 ± 0.29 mm and 2.20 ± 0.19 mm in male non-musicians and male musicians, respectively (p = 0.283). A similar increase in median cortex thickness in the angular gyrus was seen in male musicians (2.30 ± 0.18 mm) vs. non-musicians (2.13 ± 0.23 mm) (р = 0.048). Median cortex thickness in the angular gyrus in female musicians was also higher than in female non-musicians (р = 0.017 and р = 0.034) with the differences being statistically significant in both hemispheres, while differences in men were statistically significant only in the RH.

There was a trend towards increased cortex thickness in the superior temporal gyrus (lateral) of the LH in male musicians (2.68 ± 2.68 mm) vs. male non-musicians (2.42 ± 0.30 mm) (р = 0.109); that of the RH was 2.71 ± 0.11 mm in male musicians and 2.38 ± 0.22 mm in male non-musicians (р = 0.073). In female non-musicians, median cortex thickness in the lateral part of the superior temporal gyrus was 2.55 ± 0.33 mm (LH) and 2.66 ± 0.18 mm (RH); in female musicians, median values were 2.63 ± 0.18 mm (LH) and 2.70 ± 0.27 mm (RH), respectively (p = 0.504 and p = 0.904).

We also showed changes in the volume of the planum temporale in musicians. Median volume of the planum temporale in the LH was 1.84 ± 0.19 cm3 in male musicians and 1.60 ± 0.39 cm3 in male non-musicians (p = 0.214), that in the RH was 1.71 ± 0.18 and 1.41 ± 0.17 cm3, respectively (р = 0.048). In female musicians, median volume of the planum temporale was 1.62 ± 0.39 cm³ and 1.57 ± 0.20 cm³ in LH and RH, respectively. In female non-musicians, median volume of the planum temporale was similar: 1.45 ± 0.12 cm³ (р = 0.604) and 1.42 ± 0.17 cm³ (р = 0.199) in the LH and RH, respectively.

Discussion

Our study showed major differences in the brain structure in musicians vs. non-musicians. Increased volume of se- veral cortical structures was found in both male and female musicians.

Our data are consistent with several experimental studies that clearly showed that constant training and mental activities can lead to changes in the structural organization of the human brain and increase the overall volume of cortical structures [15].

Musicians who play the piano and achieve great results in their professional life should work hard. According to Andreas Eriksson’s theory, it takes at least 10,000 hours of deliberate practice to master a skill. This corresponds to about 3 hours of training every day, i.e. about 20 h every week. This hypothesis was named “a 10,000-hours rule” [13]. Such intensive systematic training and constant practice were shown to result in structural changes in the entire human brain and individual cortical structures. Se- veral studies showed that constant training in people of other professions also led to changes in their brain structure. This was shown in a study to evaluate the brain of taxi drivers in London, which showed an increase in the posterior hippocampus, which is responsible for spatial perception and spatial memory. More experienced taxi drivers were shown to have a larger volume of the caudal hippocampus [16]. Meditation and learning foreign languages were also shown to be associated with changes in the structure of the human brain.

An analysis of changes in different brain regions of musicians compared with male and female non-musicians clearly showed an increase in the volume of the superior temporal gyrus in musicians.

Our data are consistent with other authors’ data who also showed increased planum temporale, especially in musicians’ brain [13, 17, 18].

Some authors showed that the volume of the auditory cortex in musicians was 30% higher than in non-musicians [19].

Publications also showed that absolute pitch had a great influence on restructuring of musicians’ brain (plasticity), particularly on changes in the temporal regions. However, famous musicians who did not have absolute pitch, such as Igor Stravinsky and Miles Davis, were also described in literature [13].

A comparative analysis of the brain structure in musicians and non-musicians allowed us to show increases in the superior parietal region both in the RH and LH. This increase may be related to the fact that the superior parietal region is involved in the integration of sensory information and plays a key role in reading music scores [20, 21].

We showed increased volume of the parahippocampal gyrus, especially in the RH, in the brain of musicians vs. non-musicians. This can be explained by the fact that the parahippocampal gyrus is involved in the implementation of emotional and speech functions. Some authors showed activation and reorganization of the parahippocampal gyrus, especially in the RH, in subjects who were listening to music [22].

We showed increased Broca’s speech motor area in male musicians vs. male non-musicians and in female musicians vs. female non-musicians. Music lessons were shown to improve speech functions and an ability to process sound signals [23–26]. Some researchers believe that Broca’s speech motor area is actively involved in listening to and playing musical works [27]. Functional MRI was used to show activation of the Broca’s speech motor area (fields 44 and 45) in people who were listening to any musical work; activation of the premotor cortex (field 6), orbital region of the inferior frontal gyrus (field 47), and superior temporal gyrus (fields 21, 37, and 22) was also seen [28–30]. All these studies confirmed that speech processing and practicing music are closely related, and music was shown to stimulate and improve verbal working memory [31, 32].

Of great interest are our data suggesting increases in the planum temporale in male and female musicians compared with male and female non-musicians, respectively. We showed increased volume of planum temporale, particularly in the brain LH.

In this study, practicing music regularly was shown to change structural and functional brain organization. Available data suggest that music, which results in major plastic changes in human cognitive functions, can and should be used in the treatment of several neurological and psychiatric disorders. Music-supported therapy can be effective in post-stroke rehabilitation, motor activity disorders, anxiety disorders, and other disorders [33–36].

Conclusion

Our study, which investigated structural organization of the brain in musicians, clearly showed significant changes in many cortical structures of the brain, which generally contribute to the development of human musical abilities, speech, and cognitive functions.

×

About the authors

Irina N. Bogolepova

Research Center of Neurology

Author for correspondence.
Email: bogolepovaira@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8013-2748
https://istina.msu.ru/profile/Bogolepova/

D. Sci. (Med.), Professor, Full Member of RAS, Head, Laboratory of cytoarchitectonics and brain evolution, Brain Institute

Россия, Moscow

Marina V. Krotenkova

Research Center of Neurology

Email: bogolepovaira@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3820-4554

D. Sci. (Med.), Head, Department of radiation diagnostics, Institute of Clinical and Preventive Neurology

Россия, Moscow

Rodion N. Konovalov

Research Center of Neurology

Email: bogolepovaira@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5539-245X

Cand. Sci. (Med.), senior researcher, Department of radiation diagnostics, Institute of Clinical and Preventive Neurology

Россия, Moscow

Pavel A. Agapov

Research Center of Neurology

Email: bogolepovaira@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9947-7057

Cand. Sci. (Biol.), senior researcher, Laboratory of cytoarchitectonics and brain evolution, Brain Institute

Россия, Moscow

Irina G. Malofeeva

Research Center of Neurology

Email: bogolepovaira@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0006-5633-8061

junior researcher, Laboratory of cytoarchitectonics and brain evolution, Brain Institute

Россия, Moscow

Alexander T. Bikmeev

Bashkir State Medical University

Email: bogolepovaira@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3352-5255

Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Head, Laboratory of mathematical modeling, Institute of Fundamental Medicine

Россия, Ufa

References

  1. Fuchs E., Flügge G. Adult neuroplasticity: more than 40 years of research. Neural. Plast. 2014;2014:541870. doi: 10.1155/2014/541870
  2. Davidson R.J., McEwen B.S. Social influences on neuroplasticity: stress and interventions to promote well-being. Nat. Neurosci. 2012;15(5):689–695. doi: 10.1038/nn.3093
  3. Park D.C., Huang C.M. Culture wires the brain: a cognitive neuroscience perspective. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2010;5(4):391–400. doi: 10.1177/1745691610374591
  4. Shaffer J. Neuroplasticity and clinical practice: building brain power for health. Front. Psychol. 2016;7:1118. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01118
  5. McEwen B.S. Redefining neuroendocrinology: Epigenetics of brain-body communication over the life course. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2018;49:8–30. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.11.001
  6. Mateos-Aparicio P., Rodríguez-Moreno A. The impact of studying brain plasticity. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:66. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00066
  7. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Brain mechanisms of vision. Sci. Am. 1979;241(3):150–162. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0979-150
  8. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J. Physiol. 1962;160(1):106–154. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837
  9. Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex. J. Physiol. 1959;148(3):574–591. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1959.sp006308
  10. Merzenich M.M., Jenkins W.M. Reorganization of cortical representations of the hand following alterations of skin inputs induced by nerve injury, skin island transfers, and experience. J. Hand Ther. 1993;6(2):89–104. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(12)80290-0
  11. Иглмен Д. Живой мозг. Удивительные факты о нейропластичности и возможностях мозга. М.; 2022. 336 с. Eagleman D. A living brain. Amazing facts about neuroplasticity and brain capabilities. Moscow; 2022. 336 p.
  12. Giraux P., Sirigu A., Schneider F., Dubernard J.M. Cortical reorganization in motor cortex after graft of both hands. Nat. Neurosci. 2001;4(7):691–692. doi: 10.1038/89472
  13. Бреан А., Скейе Г.У. Музыка и мозг: как музыка влияет на эмоции, здоровье и интеллект. 2021. М.; 2023. 316 с. Brian A., Skeye G.U. Music and the brain: how music affects emotions, health and intelligence. 2021. Moscow; 2023. 316 p.
  14. Balbag M.A., Pedersen N.L., Gatz M. Playing a musical instrument as a protective factor against dementia and cognitive impairment: a population-based twin study. Int. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2014;2014:836748. doi: 10.1155/2014/836748
  15. Schwartz J.M., Begley S. The mind and the brain: neuroplasticity and the power of mental force. N.Y.; 2002. 420 p.
  16. Maguire E.A., Gadian D.G., Johnsrude I.S. et al. Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97(8):4398–4403. doi: 10.1073/pnas.070039597
  17. Gaser C., Schlaug G. Gray matter differences between musicians and nonmusicians. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2003;999:514–517. doi: 10.1196/annals.1284.062
  18. Avanzini G. The neurosciences and music. N.Y.; 2003. 548 p.
  19. Schneider P., Scherg M., Dosch H.G. et al. Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians. Nat. Neurosci. 2002;5(7):688–694. doi: 10.1038/nn871
  20. Панюшева Т.Д. Музыкальный мозг: обзор отечественных и зарубежных исследований. Асимметрия. 2008;2(2):41–54. Panyusheva T.D. Musical brain: a review of domestic and foreign studies. Asymmetry. 2008;2(2):41–54. 21. Павлов А.Е. Музыкальная деятельность и её мозговая организация. Вестник Московского Университета. Серия 14. Психология. 2007;(4):92–98.
  21. Pavlov A.E. Musical activity and its brain organization. Bulletin of the Moscow University. Series 14. Psychology. 2007;(4):92–98.
  22. Уэйнбергер Н. Музыка и мозг. В мире науки. 2005;Февраль:71–77. Weinberger N. Music and the brain. World of Science. 2005;February:71–77.
  23. Corrigall K.A., Trainor L.J. Enculturation to musical pitch structure in young children: evidence from behavioral and electrophysiological methods. Dev. Sci. 2014;17(1):142–158. doi: 10.1111/desc.12100
  24. Deguchi C., Boureux M., Sarlo M. et al. Sentence pitch change detection in the native and unfamiliar language in musicians and non-musicians: behavioral, electrophysiological and psychoacoustic study. Brain Res. 2012;1455:75–89. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.03.034
  25. Thompson W.F., Schellenberg E.G., Husain G. Decoding speech prosody: do music lessons help? Emotion. 2004;4(1):46–64. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.46
  26. Tierney A., Kraus N. Music training for the development of reading skills. Prog. Brain Res. 2013;207:209–241. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-63327-9.00008-4
  27. Fennell A.M., Bugos J.A., Payne B.R., Schotter E.R. Music is similar to language in terms of working memory interference. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2021;28(2):512–525. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01833-5
  28. Koelsch S., Fritz T., Schulze K. et al. Adults and children processing music: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2005;25(4):1068–1076. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.050
  29. Tillmann B., Bharucha J.J., Bigand E. Implicit learning of tonality: a self-organizing approach. Psychol. Rev. 2000;107(4):885–913. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.107.4.885
  30. Tillmann B., Janata P., Bharucha J.J. Activation of the inferior frontal cortex in musical priming. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2003;16(2):145–161. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00245-8
  31. Глозман Ш.М., Павлов А.Е. Влияние занятий музыкой на развитие пространственных и кинетических функций у детей младшего школьного возраста. Психологическая наука и образование. 2007;12(3):36–46. lozman Sh.M., Pavlov A.E. The influence of music lessons on the development of spatial and kinetic functions in children of primary school age. Psychological Science and Education. 2007;12(3):36–46.
  32. Сеунг С. Коннектом. Как мозг делает нас тем, что мы есть. М.; 2018. 442 с. Seung S. Connectome. How the brain makes us what we are. Moscow; 2018. 442 p.
  33. Särkämö T., Tervaniemi M., Laitinen S. et al. Music listening enhances cognitive recovery and mood after middle cerebral artery stroke. Brain. 2008;131(Pt 3):866–76. doi: 10.1093/brain/awn013
  34. Schlaug G., Norton A., Marchina S. et al. From singing to speaking: facilitating recovery from nonfluent aphasia. Future Neurol. 2010;5(5):657–665. doi: 10.2217/fnl.10.44
  35. Sihvonen A.J., Särkämö T., Leo V. et al. Music-based interventions in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(8):648–660. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30168-0
  36. Tong Y., Forreider B., Sun X. et al. Music-supported therapy (MST) in improving post-stroke patients' upper-limb motor function: a randomised controlled pilot study. Neurol. Res. 2015;37(5):434–440. doi: 10.1179/1743132815Y.0000000034

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download
2. Fig. 1. Structure of Broca’s area in the brain of a female musician, LH. Triangular region is shown in green; opercular region is shown in blue.

Download (347KB)
Indexing metadata
3. Fig. 2. Structure of Broca’s area in the brain of a female non-musician, LH. Triangular region is shown in green; opercular region is shown in blue.

Download (343KB)
Indexing metadata
4. Fig. 3. Relative volume of gray matter in male and female non-musicians and musicians, % of total brain volume.

Download (92KB)
Indexing metadata
5. Fig. 4. Volume of superior temporal gyrus in musicians and non-musicians, cm3.

Download (111KB)
Indexing metadata
6. Fig. 5. The volume of the upper parietal lobule of the brain of musicians and people of the control group, cm3.

Download (110KB)
Indexing metadata

Copyright (c) 2024 Bogolepova I.N., Krotenkova M.V., Konovalov R.N., Agapov P.A., Malofeeva I.G., Bikmeev A.T.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
СМИ зарегистрировано Федеральной службой по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций (Роскомнадзор).
Регистрационный номер и дата принятия решения о регистрации СМИ: серия ПИ № ФС 77-83204 от 12.05.2022.


This website uses cookies

You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.

About Cookies